1 Protests in Cuba and Marxist Leninist Attitude Cuba ‐ pompous idle assessments of “extreme left” and their ugly caricature of Marxism Leninism. The term “extreme left” is used for the historical practice of “left tendency”, on one side deriving from their fundamental ideology of Anarchists and the other deriving from the practice of concealing their reactionary face‐ that of Trotskyites. Our subject here is not the assessments and assertions of concealed‐reaction and/or of those who are seriously influenced by them, but those unintentional, unconscious, influence of Trotskyism in ʺdeedʺ. The direct or indirect ideological based attacks on Cuba, on Cuban Revolutionary government have one conclusive mindset and one latent affect to the mass readers‐ either consciously or unconsciously‐ in common; “socialism cannot be built in one country.” We do know the source of consciously yet skillfully presented accusations hidden behind the left mask with pompous phrase mongering. Aside from them not only the average Marxists Leninists sympathizers but ML parties and organizations are falling into this tactical trap that has being tried and improved by the bourgeoisie and their lackeys with century old experience in the field. That is why it is imperative to study the subjects related to the accusations directed to Cuba in particular and what Socialism is in general in order to call one as such. With few exceptions all the Marxist Leninist commentaries, statements I read about the events in Cuba have shown the influence of the “balanced” context‐ an approach of trained, learned bourgeois journalists and writers. In order to be “appeared” objective, bourgeois journalists and writers take any given issue ‐rather than sticking directly to the issue itself‐ they try to “balance” by commenting on both the “crime‐criminal” and “victim” . The murder of George Floyd is a well‐known example of this where emphasizing his “criminal past” desired to be ‐or unconsciously – overshadowing, minimizing the