24 | OPN Optics & Photonics News www.osa-opn.org GUIDED WAVES Refractive-Index Engineering of Planar Waveguides with Subwavelength Gratings Jens H. Schmid, Pavel Cheben, Przemek J. Bock, Jean Lapointe, Siegfried Janz, Dan-Xia Xu, Adam Densmore, André Delâge and Trevor J. Hall I n integrated photonic circuits, the refractive-index contrast is usually set by the choice of the material plat- form. For example, for silicon photonic circuits operating at a wavelength near l = 1.55 μm, the waveguide core and the cladding indices are given by the mate- rial constants of silicon (n = 3.5) and silicon dioxide ( n = 1.44), and waveguide devices must be designed within the constraint of these fxed values. From free-space optics, we know that periodic dielectric structures with a periodicity smaller than one half of the wavelength do not difract any light. Instead, such so-called subwavelength gratings (SWGs) act as homogeneous efective media with spatially averaged refractive index. 1 We have recently demonstrated the frst use of SWGs for refractive-index engineering in micro- photonic waveguides, providing a power- ful method for controlling the refractive index of a waveguide core in any specifc location of a photonic chip. Importantly, our method only relies on standard fab- rication techniques and can be imple- mented without any modifcations to the chip fabrication process fow. Te structure shown in (a) exemplifes refractive-index engineering of a silicon photonic wire waveguide. By etching periodic gaps of a well-defned width w and pitch L into a standard silicon pho- tonic wire, an SWG waveguide is formed with an efective core index determined by the duty ratio w/ L. Calculation of the dispersion relation of the segmented waveguide and comparison with the dis- persion of an equivalent photonic wire waveguide with identical cross section and a core index of n = 2.65, as shown in (b) confrms theoretically the concept of spatial refractive-index averaging. Experimentally, we have observed waveguiding in such SWG structures with a propagation loss as low as 2.1 dB/cm, comparable to the best photonic wire waveguides reported, and with a low and nearly wavelength- independent group index, as predicted by theory. 2 Although consistent with Bloch theory, it is fascinating to observe light propagating almost unperturbedly through so many strong discontinuities. 3 Among the applications of SWG waveguides 4 is an SWG slab waveguide structure that simultaneously acts as a lateral cladding for a photonic wire waveguide in a novel microspectrometer design and an efcient in-plane fber- chip coupling structure. Te coupler structure works by gradual modifcation of the waveguide core index, leading to mode-size transformation between a high-index photonic wire and the low- index optical fber. Measured coupling loss is 0.9 dB for TE and 1.2 dB for TM polarization. SWG waveguides were also implemented for highly ef- fcient waveguide crossings, 5 such as those shown in (c). (a) SEM image of an SWG waveguide. (b) Dispersion relation of an SWG waveguide and an equivalent photonic wire waveguide with core refractive index of 2.65 (TE polarization). (c) SWG waveguide crossings. (a) (c) (b) SWG Wire b [mm –1 ] f [s –1 ] Having the ability to intersect wave- guides with low loss and crosstalk is an important prerequisite for designing complex high-density photonic circuits. SWG waveguide loss per crossing was measured to be as low as 0.02 dB with polarization-dependent loss of less then 0.02 dB and crosstalk less than 40 dB. Tese applications demonstrate the obvious advantages of having the new degree of freedom in photonic circuit design aforded by SWG refractive- index engineering. t Jens Schmid (jens.schmid@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca), Pavel Cheben, Jean Lapointe, Siegfried Janz, Dan-Xia Xu, Adam Densmore and André Delâge are with the National Research Council Canada in Ottawa, Canada. Przemek Bock and Trevor Hall are with the University of Ottawa. References 1. S.M. Rytov. Sov. Phys. JETP 2, 466-75 (1956). 2. P.J. Bock et al. Opt. Express 18(19) 20251-62 (2010). 3. F. Morichetti. Spotlight on optics summary: www.optic- sinfobase.org/spotlight/summary.cfm?uri=ol-35-15-2526 (2010). 4. P. Cheben et al. Opt. Lett. 35(15), 2526-8 (2010). 5. P.J. Bock et al. Opt. Express 18(15), 16146-55 (2010). 6 8 10 l = 1.55 mm 2 mm 310 14 2.2 1.6