NATURE GEOSCIENCE | VOL 6 | NOVEMBER 2013 | www.nature.com/naturegeoscience 897
FOCUS
|
COMMENTARY
A
key component of DNA, cell
membranes and cellular energy
transport, phosphorus is essential
to every form of life. Yet most soils contain
only low concentrations of this nutrient.
Phosphorus inputs in the form of fertilizers
are therefore essential for food production
around the globe. e majority of phosphorus
for agriculture is mined from finite, and
therefore exhaustible
1,2
, sedimentary
phosphorite deposits. Growing demands for
food and biofuels mean that these reserves
could become exhausted in the next 40 to
400 years
1,2
. As such, phosphorus is expected
to become economically inaccessible to low-
income and food-deficient countries.
Discontent over soaring food prices
has revitalized interest in food production,
and raised awareness of the issues around
dwindling phosphorus supplies
1,3
. According
to an emerging consensus, scarcities
in phosphorus supplies and temporary
constraints in accessibility will lead to marked
rises in the cost of phosphorus. For instance,
when China introduced an export ban on
minerals including phosphorus in 2008, the
global price of phosphorus rose 50% faster
than the price of any of the main staple crops.
An elevated price prevails today.
Here, we identify three broad groups
of nations — rich phosphorus consumers,
poor and food-insecure phosphorus
consumers, and phosphorus producers —
with competing interests in the longevity,
equitability and cost of phosphorus
supplies. We argue that continued structural
inequalities in phosphorus use and supply
could exacerbate the divergent agendas of
these three groups of nations, and potentially
render a sustainable management regime of
finite phosphorus resources impossible.
Structural inequalities
High prices have not prevented farmers in
rich countries from buying phosphorus-
containing fertilizers to maximize crop
yields. Indeed, North America, western
Europe and eastern and southern Asia,
including China and India, account for
more than 80% of the global consumption
of phosphorus fertilizers (Fig. 1), despite
the fact that less than 55% of the world’s
croplands are located in these regions
4
. In
fact, phosphorus has oſten been used in
excess in many of these regions, leading
to phosphorus pollution of freshwater
and marine ecosystems
4
. Up to 80% of the
phosphorus supplied to crops is estimated
to be lost before consumption, largely due to
the erosion of agricultural soils
1
. In contrast,
expense has hindered use of phosphorus
fertilizers in low-income and food-deficient
countries, where phosphorus deficits occur
across some 30% of the cropland area
5,6
.
e location of the world’s phosphorus
reserves is equally uneven. Although precise
data on the amount of mineable phosphorus
are still lacking, the world’s phosphorus
reserves are highly concentrated, with
Morocco estimated to hold 85% of the global
share, followed by China with 6% and the
US with 3%
5
.
National interests
We contend that the interests of rich
phosphorus consumers, poor and food-
insecure phosphorus consumers, and
phosphorus producers are, to a large degree,
conflicting. If so, any possible solution to
limited supplies would conflict with the
interest of at least one group (Table 1).
Wealthy phosphorus consumers are
already using their political and economic
weight to secure future supplies from
phosphorus producers. We project that
rich phosphorus importers will try to
continue to source relatively cheap, long-
term and exclusive supplies by setting up
preferential bilateral trade arrangements with
phosphorus producers.
Low-income food-deficient countries,
many of which are now endowed with
phosphorus-deficient soils
6
, oſten as a result
of unsustainable management practices,
will want to see inequalities in access to
phosphorus supplies addressed. e challenge
for these countries will be to convince richer
countries to mitigate the consequences of
their phosphorus deficits for food production.
Assisted measures of mitigation could range
from food aid to technological transfers that
improve agricultural production.
Phosphorus-producing nations are likely
to increasingly manage their reserves to
maximize profit for both their domestic
mining and farming industries. To raise
prices, phosphorus-producing nations may
try to establish multilateral negotiations
with a cartel of producers, as the petroleum-
exporting countries tried to do with oil. It
could be argued that an increase in price
would help to conserve this exhaustible
natural resource in the long-term. However,
increased costs would also limit phosphorus
The phosphorus trilemma
Michael Obersteiner, Josep Peñuelas, Philippe Ciais, Marijn van der Velde and Ivan A. Janssens
Mineable phosphorus reserves are confined to a handful of countries. Reductions in wastage could
free up this resource for low-income, food-deficient countries.
P fertilizer input for wheat
7
0–5
5–10
10–15
15–20
20–30
>30
P fertilizer kg ha
–1
Figure 1 | Global map of phosphorus-fertilizer input for wheat (kg P per hectare), estimated for around the
year 2000. In general, the low-income and food-deficient countries in sub-Saharan Africa, central Asia
and Latin America suffer from low P inputs (0–5 kg ha
−1
) to their agricultural production systems (this
pattern is also true for other crops, alongside wheat). Most northern soils are saturated with P because of
historically high applications.
© 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved