Efficacy of arsenic filtration by Kanchan Arsenic Filter
in Nepal
Anjana Singh, Linda S. Smith, Shreekrishna Shrestha
and Narendra Maden
ABSTRACT
Groundwater arsenic contamination has caused a significant public health burden in lowland regions
of Nepal. For arsenic mitigation purposes, the Kanchan Arsenic Filter (KAF) was developed and
validated for use in 2003 after pilot studies showed its effectiveness in removing arsenic. However,
its efficacy in field conditions operating for a long period has been scarcely observed. In this study,
we observe the efficacy of KAFs running over 6 months in highly arsenic-affected households in
Nawalparasi district. We assessed pair-wise arsenic concentrations of 62 randomly selected
household tubewells before filtration and after filtration via KAFs. Of 62 tubewells, 41 had influent
arsenic concentration exceeding the Nepal drinking water quality standard value (50 μg/L). Of the 41
tubewells having unsafe arsenic levels, KAFs reduced arsenic concentration to the safe level for only
22 tubewells, an efficacy of 54%. In conclusion, we did not find significantly high efficacy of KAFs in
reducing unsafe influent arsenic level to the safe level under the in situ field conditions.
Anjana Singh
Shreekrishna Shrestha
Narendra Maden (corresponding author)
Central Department of Microbiology,
Tribhuvan University,
Kirtipur,
Kathmandu,
Nepal
E-mail: maden.narendra@gmail.com
Linda S. Smith
Filters for Families,
Dhobighat,
Lalitpur,
Nepal
and
Department of Geology,
University of Texas at Dallas,
Richardson, Texas,
USA
Key words | arsenic contamination, efficacy, Kanchan Arsenic Filter, Nepal
INTRODUCTION
The lowland region of Nepal called Terai is home for nearly 50%
of the nation’s population and 90% of Terai people depend upon
groundwater as a source of drinking water. Groundwater arsenic
contamination was discovered in Nepal in 1999 and this
prompted a large-scale assessment of arsenic (Shrestha et al.
). As of 2011, over 740,000 tubewells have been tested by
12 separate organizations and 3 and 8% of the total have been
found to exceed 50 μg/L (microgram/liter) and 10 μg/L of the
Nepal Drinking Water Quality Standard (NDWQS) and
World Health Organization (WHO) standard, respectively
(Thakur et al. ). Discovery of groundwater arsenic contami-
nation concurrently prompted research on arsenic mitigation.
The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and
Environment and Public Health Organization in collaboration
were involved in arsenic mitigation research and in 2003
developed the Kanchan Arsenic Filter (KAF) which is sustain-
able in local social and economic conditions (Ngai et al. ).
The general structure of KAF and its functioning is briefly
presented in Figure 1. Performance of KAF is influenced by
multiple factors, such as arsenic concentration and chemical
parameters of influent water (such as levels of iron, chloride,
phosphate, and hardness), flow rate, duration of use, and
maintenance, monitoring and handling of the filter (Chiew
et al. ; Pokharel et al. ; MIT ). Monitoring of
these factors can be difficult not only for users but also for
organizations involved in the mitigation program. In a pilot
study, average arsenic removal efficiency of KAF was 90%
and over 95% of filters (n ¼ 1,034) were found to reduce
arsenic concentration to below 50 μg/L (Ngai et al. ).
The efficacy of KAF varied in that study depending upon
the influent arsenic concentration: for example, of three
KAFs tested with an arsenic level of 1,000 μg/L, one reduced
to 90 μg/L and the other two to 150 μg/L; in contrast, of 72
KAFs tested with an arsenic level of 200 μg/L, 67 reduced
to <50 μg/L and only five had >50 μg/L. In our study, we
evaluate the efficacy of KAFs under in situ field conditions
by measuring arsenic concentration of tubewell (influent
water) and KAF-filtered water (effluent water).
596 © IWA Publishing 2014 Journal of Water and Health | 12.3 | 2014
doi: 10.2166/wh.2014.148
Downloaded from https://iwaponline.com/jwh/article-pdf/12/3/596/395791/596.pdf
by guest
on 14 June 2020