Spinal Cord (2020) 58:35–42
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-019-0338-5
ARTICLE
Utility of the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory in people
with spinal cord injury
Marlon L. Wong
1,2
●
Loriann Fleming
1
●
Linda E. Robayo
1
●
Eva Widerström-Noga
1
Received: 9 June 2019 / Revised: 22 July 2019 / Accepted: 23 July 2019 / Published online: 20 August 2019
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International Spinal Cord Society 2019
Abstract
Study design Cohort/psychometric study
Objectives The primary objective was to determine the psychometric properties and the utility of the Neuropathic Pain
Symptom Inventory (NPSI) in subgrouping people with moderate to severe neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury (SCI).
Setting University-based laboratory in Miami, FL USA.
Methods Seventy-two people with chronic SCI and neuropathic pain were included in this study. The NPSI, Numeric
Rating Scale (NRS), Multidimensional Pain Inventory pain severity and perceived support subscales (MPI-PS and MPI-S,
respectively), and the Coping Strategies Questionnaire were administered. The NPSI was administered twice, with a 2–4-
week period between measurement sessions.
Results The NPSI total score demonstrated good internal consistency with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.70. The test–retest
reliability (intraclass correlations) ranged from 0.65 to 0.73 for the NPSI subscores and 0.79 for the total NPSI score.
Further, construct validity was supported by moderate and significant positive correlations with the pain intensity NRS and
pain severity subscale of the MPI (MPI-PS) (r > 0.40). Cluster analysis of factor scores derived from NPSI subscales, NRS,
and MPI-PS scores revealed three distinct subgroups: (1) low-moderate, (2) moderate, and (3) high pain symptom severity
with mean NPSI sum scores of 7.1, 17.5, and 33.8, respectively.
Conclusion The NPSI demonstrated good psychometric properties in people with neuropathic pain after SCI. Moreover, it
has utility for establishing pain symptom phenotypes.
Introduction
Neuropathic pain is an underrecognized contributing factor
to the burden and diminished quality of life for people with
spinal cord injury (SCI) [1]. In fact, neuropathic pain affects
a large proportion of people with SCI, with an estimated
prevalence rate of 53% [2]. Because neuropathic pain is
known to be more severe and resistant to treatment than
other types of pain [3], detailed diagnosis and effective
management of neuropathic pain after SCI is an important
component of medical care and research aimed at optimiz-
ing the quality of life in this population. However, currently
there are no interventions that provide consistent and
widespread benefit for neuropathic pain after SCI [4]. Thus,
detailed diagnosis and characterization of neuropathic pain
associated with SCI is required for developing more per-
sonalized and effective pain management [4, 5].
The Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) is one
of the most widely used tools for characterizing neuropathic
pain symptom severity, and it has been validated in over 50
different languages [6, 7]. The NPSI is comprised of five
subscales, each representing different dimensions of neuro-
pathic pain: burning spontaneous pain (burning), pressing
spontaneous pain (pressing), paroxysmal pain (paroxysmal),
evoked pain (evoked), and paresthesia/dysesthesia. This
factorial structure makes the NPSI well suited for
* Marlon L. Wong
mwong2@miami.edu
1
Miami Project to Cure Paralysis and Department of Neurological
Surgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami,
Miami, FL, USA
2
Department of Physical Therapy, Miller School of Medicine,
University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
Supplementary information The online version of this article (https://
doi.org/10.1038/s41393-019-0338-5) contains supplementary
material, which is available to authorized users.