Abstract RESEARCH Journal of the American Pharmacists Association www.japha.org 354 • JAPhA • 48:3 • M ay/J une 2008 Received January 28, 2008. Accepted for publication March 7, 2008. Jon C. Schommer, PhD, is Professor, Col- lege of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. Lourdes G. Planas, PhD, is Assistant Professor, College of Pharmacy, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City. Kathleen A. John- son, PhD, is Associate Professor, School of Pharmacy, University of Southern Cali- fornia, Los Angeles. William R. Doucette, PhD, is Professor, College of Pharmacy, and Director, Center for Improving Medication Use in the Community, College of Pharma- cy, University of Iowa, Iowa City. Correspondence: Jon C. Schommer, PhD, Professor, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, 308 Harvard Street, SE, Min- neapolis, MN 55455. Fax: 612-625-9931. E- mail: schom010@umn.edu Disclosure: The authors declare no con- flicts of interest or financial interests in any product or service mentioned in this article, including grants, employment, gifts, stock holdings, or honoraria. Acknowledgments: To American Pharma- cists Association (APhA) staff with whom we collaborated for this project: Anne Burns, Maria Gorrick, James Owen, Debo- rah Ruddy, and Margaret Tomecki. Funding: By APhA through an unrestricted grant from Wyeth. Data were collected and made available for analysis by APhA. Objectives: To collect and describe information from providers of medication therapy management (MTM) services regarding (1) implementation strategies used for providing MTM services to patients/clients; (2) specific measures, if any, used to quantify the costs and benefits of MTM; (3) how the value of MTM services was tracked during 2007; and (4) barriers to offering MTM services to patients/clients. Design: Descriptive, nonexperimental, cross-sectional study. Setting: United States during 2007. Participants: Of the 6,873 providers who presumably received an e-mail invitation to participate in the survey, 687 (10%) responded and were included for analysis. Interventions: Self-administered online survey. Main outcome measures: Implementation and monitoring of MTM. Results: 65% of survey respondents were involved in providing MTM services as defined in the consensus definition used. Of these, 47% reported that they were contracted with programs to provide MTM services. Of respondents, 35% indicated that these contracts provided a positive return on investment (ROI), 31% reported that they did not provide a positive ROI, and 34% reported that they did not know. Providers varied widely on how they implemented MTM service offerings and typically did not use specific measures to quantify the costs and benefits of MTM. In addition, they did not use systematic methods for assessing value from providing MTM services to their patients. Conclusion: This descriptive environmental scan can serve as a baseline measure and be used for future comparisons. Keywords: Medication therapy management, cost analysis, pharmacy services, surveys, return on investment. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2008;48:354–363. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2008.08012 Pharmacist-provided medication therapy management (part 1): Provider perspectives in 2007 Jon C. Schommer, Lourdes G. Planas, Kathleen A. Johnson, and William R. Doucette