Insider ownership, bidask spread, and stock splits: Evidence from the Stock Exchange of Thailand Maneeporn Gorkittisunthorn a , Seksak Jumreornvong b , Piman Limpaphayom c, a Thanachart Securities Public Company Limited, Thailand b Thammasat University, Thailand c Sasin Graduate Institute of Business Administration of Chulalongkorn University, Chula 12, Phyathai Road, Bangkok 10330, Thailand Available online 20 March 2006 Abstract This paper examines the moderating effect of insider ownership on bidask spread changes during stock splits in Thailand, an economy with highly concentrated ownership structures. Consistent with the liquidity hypothesis, the overall finding shows that bidask spread declines significantly after stock splits. The results also indicate that there is a significant relation between insider ownership and the change in bidask spread. Specifically, significant reductions in bidask spread occurred mostly among firms with low levels of insider ownership before stock splits. Bidask spreads remain virtually unchanged for shares with high ownership concentration. The findings highlight the link between corporate governance structure, market microstructure, and corporate financial decisions in emerging markets. © 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. JEL classification: G14; G15; G32 Keywords: Bidask spread; Liquidity hypothesis; Insider ownership; Stock split; Thailand 1. Introduction During the past decades, considerable attention has been devoted to examining the relation between insider ownership and various corporate financial decisions. The reason is that insider ownership plays a critical role in the agency conflicts between managers and shareholders arising from the separation of ownership and control (Jensen & Meckling, 1976). Morck, Shleifer, and Vishny (1988) and McConnell and Servaes (1990) investigate the relation between managerial International Review of Financial Analysis 15 (2006) 450 461 * Corresponding author. E-mail address: piman.limpaphayom@sasin.edu (P. Limpaphayom). 1057-5219/$ - see front matter © 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2005.09.004