Pig-to-Rabbit Islet Transplantation as an Immunologic Model of
Pig-to-Human Islet Xenografts
V.E. Papalois, J. Lee, W. McKane, N. Browning, A. Palmer, N. Hakim, T. Cairns, and D. Taube
U
NIMMUNIZED humans have natural antibody that
binds to Gal1-3Gal expressed on pig red blood cells
(RBC), mononuclear cells (PBMC), and vascular endothe-
lial cells (VEC).
1
We have previously demonstrated that
adult pig pancreata express Gal1-3Gal on the ductal cells
(PDC) and intraislet capillaries (PIC) but not on the
endocrine cells (PEC).
2
In addition, islets obtained from
adult pig pancreata by collagenase digestion lose the Gal1-
3Gal expression found on the PIC.
2
Those studies demon-
strated that the challenge of pig-to-human islet transplan-
tation is different to that of vascularized solid organs. In the
present study, we aimed to define a small animal combina-
tion that would be humorally indistinct from pig-to-human,
to allow a full description of the sequence of histologic and
immunologic events following islet xenotransplantation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We investigated the binding of natural anti-pig antibody to RBC,
PBMC, VEC, PDC, PIC, PEC, and purified islets (PI) in humans
and in three selected species: mouse (C57BL/6), rat (Sprague
Dawley), and rabbit (Half Lop). Antibody binding was assessed by
hemagglutination (RBC), flow cytometry (PBMC), and immuno-
histochemistry (VEC, PDC, PIC, PI).
RESULTS
The results are presented in Table 1. Only the pig-to rabbit
combination provided the same antibody profile as pig-to-
human. Rat and mouse models have been previously used
as recipients in pig islet xenotransplantation, but our results
show that they are not adequate pig-to-human immunologic
surrogates.
DISCUSSION
Methods for induction of diabetes in rabbits are well
established
3
and the pig-to-rabbit islet xenotransplantation
model allows studies of graft function as well as of histo-
logic and immunologic events. We have started a program
of islet xenotransplantation in rabbits by intrahepatic injec-
tion of unpurified pig islets isolated by using the Ricordi
semiautomated method.
4
Provisional data indicate that
residual nonendocrine tissue causes necrosis and a mixed
infiltrate. Insulin staining indicates that isolated islets sur-
vive at the time of sacrifice (5 to 6 days) without provoking
a local infiltrate.
REFERENCES
1. Platt JL, Parker W, Linn SS, et al: In Cooper DKC, Kemp E,
Platt JL, et al (eds): Xenotransplantation. Berlin: Springer-Verlag;
1997, p 16
2. Papalois VE, Romagnoli J, Lee J, et al: Transplant Proc
30:656, 1998
3. Mumtaz FH, Sullivan ME, Thompson CS, et al: J Urol
162:558, 1999
4. Ricordi C, Socci C, Davalli AM, et al: Surgery 107:688, 1990
From Brent Laboratory, St Mary’s Hospital, London, United
Kingdom.
Address reprint requests to V.E. Papalois, Brent Laboratory,
St Mary’s Hospital, Praed Street, London W2 1NY, United
Kingdom.
Table 1. Results of Binding () or no Binding () of Mouse, Rat, Rabbit, and Human Antibody to Different Pig Cell Types
Species RBC PBMC VEC PDC PIC PEC PI
Mouse - - + + - + +
Rat - - + + - - -
Rabbit + + + + + - -
Human + + + + + - -
0041-1345/00/$–see front matter © 2000 by Elsevier Science Inc.
PII S0041-1345(00)01128-3 655 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10010
1070 Transplantation Proceedings, 32, 1070 (2000)