Chemical Engineering Journal 170 (2011) 209–219
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Chemical Engineering Journal
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/cej
Chitosan based ceramic ultrafiltration membrane: Preparation, characterization
and application to remove Hg(II) and As(III) using polymer enhanced
ultrafiltration
Somen Jana
a
, Anirban Saikia
b
, M.K. Purkait
a,∗
, Kaustubha Mohanty
a,∗
a
Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati 781039, India
b
Department of Chemical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Raipur, Chhattisgarh 492001, India
article info
Article history:
Received 26 November 2010
Received in revised form 11 March 2011
Accepted 14 March 2011
Keywords:
Chitosan impregnation
Ceramic membrane
Crosslinking
Heavy metals
PEUF
abstract
This work presents the fabrication of chitosan based ceramic membranes using dip coating technique.
Low-cost ceramic supports were prepared from local clay of IIT Guwahati and kaolin with an average pore
size of 1093 nm and porosity of 0.37. Different ceramic membranes were prepared by varying chitosan
concentration and dipping time and were characterized using scanning electron microscope (SEM), air
and hydraulic permeability tests. The average pore sizes were in the range of 760–13 nm which confirmed
that the chitosan impregnated ceramic membranes were applicable for both microfiltration (MF) and
ultrafiltration (UF) applications. An increase in both chitosan concentration and dipping time was found
to reduce the pore size. The lowest pore size ultrafiltration membrane (pore size: 13 nm) was used for the
removal of mercury and arsenic from wastewater by polymer enhanced ultrafiltration (PEUF) technique
using polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) as the chelating agent. The effects of initial concentrations of mercury,
arsenic and PVA on the extent of removal of both the heavy metals were investigated in detail. The
efficiency of PEUF was explored in terms of rejection of metals and permeates flux. Almost 100% removals
were observed for both 500 gL
-1
mercury and 1000 gL
-1
arsenic.
© 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The uses of ultrafiltration membranes are gaining a lot of
interest now-a-days due to their higher selectivity, permeation
rate, and chemical and thermal stability. In recent years, vari-
ous UF membranes were synthesized with very good structural
integrity, fouling resistance and high selectivity. These membranes
were not tried industrially due to the high cost of the support
(1600–20,000 $/m
2
) [1]. Generally, the ceramic supports were pre-
pared from alumina, kaolin, ball clay and quartz [2]. So there is a
need to look for alternative low-cost materials for preparing the
ceramic support so as to make the prepared membrane commer-
cially competitive.
The composite UF membranes constitute of different types
of thin polymeric layers such as; polysulfone [3], styrene acry-
lonitrile [2], cellulose acetate [4], polyvinyl acetate, polyvinyl
pyrrolidone [5], polydimethylsiloxane [6]. Chitosan, which is an
amino polysaccharide with many reactive amino and hydroxyl
group, is a promising precursor for UF membrane preparation.
∗
Corresponding authors. Tel.: +91 361 2582267/2582262; fax: +91 361 2582291.
E-mail addresses: mihir@iitg.ernet.in (M.K. Purkait), kmohanty@iitg.ernet.in
(K. Mohanty).
During crosslinking with glutaraldehyde, solubility of chitosan is
decreased sharply and hydrophilicity increased which are very
important factors for a membrane precursor [7]. This article focused
on the preparation of chitosan based ultrafiltration membrane
using low cost ceramic support.
To prepare the UF top layer over the ceramic support, many
techniques were reported such as spray coating [4], grafting [5],
spin coating [8], self assembly [9], dip coating [4] and vapor
deposition [10]. Among these methods, dip coating is simple, inex-
pensive and thus most desirable choice for industrial purpose. UF
membranes were used for the removal of high molecular weight
substrate, oil from water, colloidal material, polymer molecules and
organic–inorganic pollutants.
Pollution due to the discharge of heavy metals to water bodies
is one of the serious environmental problems worldwide. Metals
like mercury and arsenic are found in industrial effluents and in
groundwater and pose serious threats to the environment. These
pollutants are not only non-biodegradable but are toxic even
at low concentration. The general methodologies for removal of
mercury ions (safe limit 2 ppb) from aqueous solution are absorp-
tion [11], chelation-enhanced method [12] and electrocoagulation
[13]. Arsenic (safe limit 10 ppb) was separated by inorganic and
organic adsorbents [14] including bioadsorbents [15]. However,
these methods have several disadvantages like incomplete metal
1385-8947/$ – see front matter © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.cej.2011.03.056