Organ Donation for Children: The Road Ahead Over the past decade, signicant policy changes have been made to the national organ allocation system, which is managed by the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) under federal contract by the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN). Some of these changes may have contributed directly to the decreased pediatric waitlist mortality noted in this months article entitled Pediatric Organ Donation and Transplantation,an OPTN database review by Workman et al. 1 To nd new ways to further decrease pediatric waitlist mortality, the authors examined the use of pediatric Donation after Circulatory Determination of Death (DCDD) donors and found that most organs procured from these donors are used in adults. Although the authors seem disappointed to discover that pediatric DCDD organs are not being used for pediatric transplant recipients, they do acknowledge that any use of organs in adult recipients is good for pediatric patients in that it decreases the competition for the remaining organs. There has been a long-standing commitment by UNOS/OPTN to protect the welfare of children. We would caution against an us versus them mentality in the allocation of this scarce and precious resource. 2,3 Our efforts to increase access to transplantation for children should focus on subpopulations of children at the highest risk of waitlist morbidity and mortality, while limiting any signicant adverse effect to the remaining pediatric or adult transplant recipients. In addition, we must be cautious to avoid viewing specic donor populations as belongingto specic recipient groups simply based on age, geog- raphy, gender, race, and so forth. We applaud efforts, such as the Organ Donation Breakthrough Collaborative, that have resulted in increased rates of organ donation. 4 The increased use of DCDD kidneys and livers for transplantation into children may be one method to increase the number of pediatric transplants. 5 However, most transplant programs have proceeded cautiously given recent improvements in pediatric organ allocation that have allowed children priority access to the highest quality of organ donors. For instance, pediatric kidney transplant programs have been reluctant to use DCDD kidneys in their patients after the institution of Share 35, a policy that gave pediatric patients a high priority for kid- neys from donors aged ,35 years old. This ready access to high-quality deceased donor kidneys should not eliminate efforts to pursue living donation as the primary option for kidney transplantation in children. As pointed out by the authors, there has been a decline in living donor kidney transplants in children since the institution of Share 35. 6 This trend has not only reduced the overall number of donor organs, but it has also decreased the average graft survival in pediatric recipients, given the signicant longevity advantage of living donor grafts com- pared with even the highest-quality deceased donor grafts. 7 The long-term biliary issues seen in the adult DCDD liver transplant experience has also limited the use of these grafts in small children. 8,9 AUTHORS: Heung Bae Kim, MD, and Craig W. Lillehei, MD Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston Childrens Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts KEY WORDS pediatric transplantation, organ donation, organ allocation, pediatric waitlist mortality, donation after circulatory determination of death, donation after cardiac death ABBREVIATIONS UNOSUnited Network for Organ Sharing OPTNOrgan Procurement and Transplantation Network DCDDDonation after Circulatory Determination of Death Opinions expressed in these commentaries are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the American Academy of Pediatrics or its committees. www.pediatrics.org/cgi/doi/10.1542/peds.2013-1005 doi:10.1542/peds.2013-1005 Accepted for publication Mar 28, 2013 Address correspondence to Craig W. Lillehei, MD, Department of Surgery, Boston Childrens Hospital, Fegan 3, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail: craig.lillehei@childrens.harvard.edu PEDIATRICS (ISSN Numbers: Print, 0031-4005; Online, 1098-4275). Copyright © 2013 by the American Academy of Pediatrics FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Drs Kim and Lillehei have served on the Board of the New England Organ Bank and several committees within the United Network for Organ Sharing. FUNDING: No external funding. COMPANION PAPER: A companion to this article can be found on page e1723, online at www.pediatrics.org/cgi/doi/10.1542/peds. 2012-3992. e1946 KIM and LILLEHEI by guest on October 7, 2021 www.aappublications.org/news Downloaded from