[CANCER RESEARCH 59, 4898 – 4905, October 1, 1999]
Potent Topoisomerase I Inhibition by Novel Silatecans Eliminates Glioma
Proliferation in Vitro and in Vivo
1
Ian F. Pollack,
2
Melanie Erff, David Bom, Thomas G. Burke, J. Thompson Strode, and Dennis P. Curran
Department of Neurosurgery, Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute Brain Tumor Center [I. F. P., M. E.], University of Pittsburgh
School of Medicine [I. F. P., M. E.], and Department of Chemistry, University of Pittsburgh [I. F. P., M. E., D. B., D. P. C.], Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213-2583, and
Experimental Therapeutics Program, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky Colleges of Pharmacy and Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky 40506-0286 [T. G. B., J. T. S.]
ABSTRACT
Although topoisomerase inhibitors, such as camptothecin and topotecan,
have been widely used in the treatment of nonglial tumors, their application
for gliomas has been limited by poor efficacy relative to toxicity that may in
part reflect limited bioavailability and blood stability of these agents. How-
ever, the potential promise of this class of agents has fostered efforts to
develop new, more potent, and less toxic inhibitors that may be clinically
relevant. Using a cascade radical annulation route to the camptothecin fam-
ily, we developed a series of novel camptothecin analogues, 7-silylcamptoth-
ecins (“silatecans”), that exhibited potent inhibition of topoisomerase I, dra-
matically improved blood stability, and sufficient lipophilicity to favor blood-
brain barrier transit. We explored the efficacy of a series of these agents
against a panel of five high-grade glioma cell lines to identify a promising
compound for further preclinical testing. One of the most active agents in our
systems (DB67) inhibited tumor growth in vitro with an ED
50
ranging be-
tween 2 and 40 ng/ml, at least 10-fold more potent than the effects observed
with topotecan, and at least comparable with those of SN-38, the active
metabolite of CPT-11. Because DB67 also exhibited the highest human blood
stability of any of the agents examined, this agent was then selected for in vivo
studies. A dose-escalation study of this agent in a nude mouse U87 glioma
model system demonstrated a concentration-dependent effect, with tumor
growth inhibition at day 28 postimplantation (the day control animals began
to require sacrifice because of large tumor size) of 61 7% and 73 3%
after administration of DB67 doses of 3 and 10 mg/kg/day, respectively, for 5
days beginning on postimplantation day 7. Animals that continued treatment
with 10 mg/kg/day in three additional 21-day cycles all remained progression
free after >90 days of follow-up but later developed enlarging tumors after
treatment was stopped. However, a slightly higher dose (30 mg/kg/day)
induced complete tumor regression after only two cycles in all study animals
and was effective even if treatment was delayed until large, bulky tumors had
developed. Application of the 30 mg/kg/day dose to treat established intracra-
nial glioma xenografts led to long-term (>90 day) survival in six of six
animals, whereas all controls died of progressive disease (P < 0.00001). No
apparent toxicity was encountered in any of the treated animals. In summary,
the present studies indicate that silatecans may hold significant promise for
the treatment of high-grade gliomas and provide a rationale for proceeding
with further preclinical evaluation of their efficacy and safety versus com-
mercially available camptothecin derivatives.
INTRODUCTION
High-grade gliomas present a major therapeutic challenge (1– 4)
because these poorly circumscribed, biologically aggressive lesions
typically are refractory to surgery, radiotherapy, and conventional
chemotherapy. Accordingly, there is a strong rationale for examining
the efficacy of novel chemotherapeutic strategies as a means for
enhancing disease control.
Topo
3
I inhibitors are a class of agents that interfere with DNA
“unwinding” during DNA replication and RNA transcription and
stabilize DNA-topo I complexes through noncovalent interactions to
yield enzyme-linked DNA single-strand breaks. Prolonged exposure
to these agents in replicating cells produces lethal double-strand DNA
breaks that can trigger the induction of programmed cell death (5). In
this way, these agents function by subverting the normal topo I
enzyme to “poison,” and ultimately induce cytotoxicity in, rapidly
dividing tumor cells (6), which typically have high levels of topo I
activity (7–9). Topo I inhibitors have shown significant promise as
antineoplastic agents in in vitro studies. Unfortunately, early topo I
inhibitors, such as camptothecin (10, 11), suffered from poor solubil-
ity, limited bioavailability secondary to albumin binding, and rapid
hydrolysis at physiological pH of the lactone ring to an inactive open
form (6, 11).
Subsequently, a number of camptothecin derivatives, such as
topotecan and irinotecan (CPT-11), were developed that exhibited
somewhat improved aqueous solubility and bioavailability (12,
13). Topotecan has shown substantial promise in preclinical and
initial clinical studies with several tumor types (6, 11, 14, 15), but
this activity has yet to be duplicated in patients with brain tumors
(16 –19), despite the apparent cerebrospinal fluid penetrance of this
agent (20). In one study that used a 24-h infusion of 5.5–7.5 mg/m
2
every 21 days, no activity was observed in nine high-grade, non-
brainstem gliomas or in 14 brainstem gliomas (16). Other studies
of topotecan in recurrent central nervous system tumors have also
observed little if any activity, even using high doses (3.5 mg/m
2
/
day administered in 5-day courses; Refs. 16 –19). One potential
shortcoming of topotecan that may account for its limited clinical
activity against brain tumors is its rapid hydrolysis to the inactive
open-ring form (13, 21, 22), which may limit the ability of thera-
peutically relevant concentrations of the active drug to persist
within the tumor for a sufficient duration to induce cytotoxicity.
CPT-11, which is also undergoing early clinical testing (12, 23–
26), is actually a largely inactive prodrug that is metabolized to
form SN-38 (27); significant interpatient differences in metabolism
may account for wide variability in the accumulation of active and
inactive drug metabolites and hence both toxicity and efficacy
(23, 28, 29).
Recognizing the potential promise but apparent limitations of the
available topo I inhibitors, we undertook synthesis of a series of novel
camptothecin derivatives, using a cascade radical annulation route to
the campothecin family. To enhance lipophilicity (and the potential
for transfer across the blood-brain barrier) as well as potentially
inhibit hydrolysis and albumin binding and increase blood stability, a
series of 7-silyl-modified campothecins (silatecans) were developed.
These agents exhibit potent inhibition of topo I (30, 31), dramatically
improved blood stability, and profound inhibition of glioma growth in
vitro, with some derivatives exhibiting more than 10-fold greater
Received 10/30/98; accepted 1/25/99.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page
charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with
18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
1
This work was supported in part by Grants NS01810 and NS37704 (to I. F. P.),
CA63653 (to T. G. B.), GM31678 (to D. P. C.), American Cancer Society Research Grant
Awards DHP-138 and RPG-95– 059-03-CDD (to T. G. B.), and the Lucille Markey Trust
Grant (to T. G. B.).
2
To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Neurosurgery,
Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh, 3705 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213. Phone:
(412) 692-5881; Fax: (412) 692-5921; E-mail: Pollaci@chplink.chp.edu.
3
The abbreviations used are: topo, topoisomerase; MTS, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-
5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium; PMS, phenazine metho-
sulfate; HPLC, high-performance liquid chromatography; TEA, triethylamine; DB67,
7-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin.
4898
Research.
on November 30, 2015. © 1999 American Association for Cancer cancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from