Research Article
An Application of the Coherent Noise Model for
the Prediction of Aftershock Magnitude Time Series
Stavros-Richard G. Christopoulos
1,2
and Nicholas V. Sarlis
2,3
1
Faculty of Engineering, Environment and Computing, Coventry University, Priory Street, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK
2
Solid Earth Physics Institute, Department of Physics, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens,
Panepistimiopolis, Zografos, 157 84 Athens, Greece
3
Section of Solid State Physics, Department of Physics, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens,
Panepistimiopolis, Zografos, 157 84 Athens, Greece
Correspondence should be addressed to Stavros-Richard G. Christopoulos; strichr@phys.uoa.gr
Received 18 July 2016; Accepted 9 October 2016; Published 20 February 2017
Academic Editor: Alicia Cordero
Copyright © 2017 Stavros-Richard G. Christopoulos and Nicholas V. Sarlis. Tis is an open access article distributed under the
Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided
the original work is properly cited.
Recently, the study of the coherent noise model has led to a simple (binary) prediction algorithm for the forthcoming earthquake
magnitude in afershock sequences. Tis algorithm is based on the concept of natural time and exploits the complexity exhibited by
the coherent noise model. Here, using the relocated catalogue from Southern California Seismic Network for 1981 to June 2011, we
evaluate the application of this algorithm for the afershocks of strong earthquakes of magnitude ≥6. Te study is also extended
by using the Global Centroid Moment Tensor Project catalogue to the case of the six strongest earthquakes in the Earth during the
last almost forty years. Te predictor time series exhibits the ubiquitous 1/ noise behavior.
1. Introduction
Te prediction of the magnitudes and occurrence times of
afershocks is of crucial importance for restricting the losses
caused by strong earthquakes (EQs, hereafer) because build-
ings already damaged by the mainshock may collapse upon
the occurrence of a strong afershock. Recently, an algorithm
has been suggested [1] on the basis of the coherent noise
model [2–4] and natural time [5–7] that might be useful for
the determination of both magnitudes and occurrence times
of afershocks. It is the main scope of the present paper to
investigate the applicability of such an algorithm to afershock
time series in Southern California. Tis area has been selected
in view of the publication [8] of an accurate waveform relo-
cated EQ catalogue for Southern California from 1981 to June
2011 [9] that exhibits tighter spatial clustering of seismicity
than the routinely generated catalogue does.
Te coherent noise model [2–4] is a model that shows
reorganization events (avalanches) whose size distribution
follows a power law over many decades and displays afer-
shock events. Tese events have been shown [3, 10, 11] to
exhibit a behavior similar to that of the Omori-Utsu law [12];
see also [13, 14], for real EQ afershocks. Moreover, it has
been recently shown [15] that it is compatible with the unifed
scaling law [16] of waiting times between EQs.
In a time series comprising avalanches (or EQs), natu-
ral time
= / serves as an index for the occurrence of the
th event [5–7]. Natural time focuses on the sequential order
of the events and the analysis is usually made by using the pair
(
,
), where
is a quantity proportional to the size (and
hence to the energy) of the th event. Natural time analysis
has found useful applications in a variety of felds: Statistical
Physics (e.g., [17–23]), Cardiology (e.g., [24–27]), Geophysics
(e.g., [6, 28–32]), Atmospheric Sciences (e.g., [33, 34]),
Seismology (e.g., [35–40]), Physics of EQs (e.g., [41–45]), EQ
prediction (e.g., [5, 46–52]), and so on (for a recent review
see [7]). For the case of EQs [36],
∝ 10
, where
is
the magnitude of the th EQ and ≈ 1.5. Te two quantities
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Complexity
Volume 2017, Article ID 6853892, 27 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6853892