COMMENTARY Dr Sewitch and colleagues at the University of Montreal and McGill University undertook a prospective study that pro- vided evidence for the important relationship between patient-physician discordance and patient nonadherence with medication for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). There are various theories of adherence (the term “com- pliance” is no longer politically correct!). The authors’ analyses support the communication theory of adherence, which purports that adherence depends on an effective patient-physician dialogue. “Patient-physician discordance” is defined as the difference between patient and physician evaluations of health-related information. It can be meas- ured with the Patient-Physician Discordance Scale, which compares responses by patients and physicians who, immedi- ately following an office encounter, independently complete a questionnaire. Three domains are considered: symptoms and treatment, well-being, and communication and satisfaction. Another important factor in the adherence process is the presence or absence of psychological distress in the patient; indeed, if there is discordance and distress, it may be useful for the physician to schedule follow-up appointments. For all patients, a low risk of nonadherence was associated with longer duration of IBD, greater belief by the patient that the medication would be beneficial and lower total dis- cordance. These data suggest that patients with more expe- rience with IBD were less likely to deliberately stop taking medication. Sometimes patients do not adhere to the treatment reg- imen for unintentional reasons. As Maida Sewitch and her colleagues point out, “a new model of patient adherence has been proposed in which effective patient-physician dia- logue is central to promoting patient adherence”. Psychosocial factors may contribute not only to patient nonadherence but also to physicians’ and patients’ health- related perceptions. These findings are also in keeping with the health psychology literature, which emphasizes the importance of stress and social support on the adoption of lifestyle changes. What are the implications of this paper for the practicing gastroenterologist? First, to recognize that “adherence” (or “compliance”) is a problem, especially in patients with chronic diseases like Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Secondly, to recognize that nonadherence may be both intentional and unintentional: of the 41% of the patients who were non- adherent to medication, 81% indicated that this was acciden- tal. Finally, this paper highlights what we have all suspected for some time “...the therapeutic relationship, as well as individual clinical and psychosocial characteristics, influence adherence to medication”. You probably won’t remember the results of the “simple bivariate generalized estimating equations analyses” that “active disease, longer duration of disease, scheduling another appointment, consulting another health professional, pre- scribed steroids, and higher discordance on well-being were associated with decreased risks of overall nonadherence to medication”. What I will remember, however, is that there are: Sophisticated measures to predict who will and who will not be adherent; Ways of assessing discordance between the patient and physician; and Sophisticated psychosocial measures that can be used to evaluate, for example, patient stress. ARTICLE Sewitch MJ, Abrahamowicz M, Barkun A, Bitton A, Wild GE, Cohen A, Dobkin PL. Patient nonadher- ence to medication in inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98:1535-44. Can J Gastroenterol Vol 18 No 2 February 2004 131 CANADIAN GASTROENTEROLOGY ELSEWHERE Patient nonadherence to medication in inflammatory bowel disease Alan BR Thomson MD PhD FRCPC FACP ©2004 Pulsus Group Inc. All rights reserved Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta Correspondence: Dr Alan BR Thomson, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, 205 College Plaza, 8215-112 Street, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2C8. Telephone 780-407-6490, fax 780-407-7964, e-mail allan.thomson@ualberta.ca