religions
Commentary
Interpreting Literary Ecologies and Extending Spheres of
Concern: A Note on Bachelard’s The Poetics of Space
for Eco-Theology
Jolyon G. R. Pruszinski
Citation: Pruszinski, Jolyon G. R..
2021. Interpreting Literary Ecologies
and Extending Spheres of Concern: A
Note on Bachelard’s The Poetics of
Space for Eco-Theology. Religions 12:
891. https://doi.org/10.3390/
rel12100891
Academic Editor: Alison Milbank
Received: 10 August 2021
Accepted: 13 October 2021
Published: 18 October 2021
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral
with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional affil-
iations.
Copyright: © 2021 by the author.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).
Department of Religion, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA; jolyonp@princeton.edu
Abstract: This critical note addresses two key features of eco-theology with regard to future prospect:
that literary analysis is an important mode of eco-theological work and that an important function
of eco-theology is to expand readers’ spheres of concern to include even the most remote of global
environmental issues. Working from Tweed’s contention in Crossing and Dwelling that a central
function of religion is the process of making homes, the note emphasizes the home as the primary
sphere of concern and the need for eco-theological work to extend the concern naturally associated
with the private home to the broadest possible sphere: the whole earth as conceived as human home.
As pertaining to literary-analytical resources for this eco-theological endeavor, the note highlights
the importance of Gaston Bachelard’s The Poetics of Space. Bachelard’s work offers a compelling
exploration of the psychological connection between the most intimate spheres of concern (the private
home) and the most extended ones (the broader world). Broader eco-theological engagement with his
work will employ resources both for understanding relations between the relative scales of human
ecology and for expanding spheres of concern, particularly in extending that concern often reserved
for the most intimate ecological sphere to the most expansive.
Keywords: Bachelard; poetics; eco-theology; literary analysis; dwelling; home; ecology; periphery;
solidarity; theory
1. Eco-Theology and Expanded Spheres of Concern
Eco-theology, as currently conceived, involves a diverse set of interests and a variety
of modes of inquiry.
1
Among the interests that appear repeatedly in the work of those
engaged in eco-theology is the interest to support a broadened sphere of concern among
readers beyond their natural, more private, or parochial spheres of concern, to include
a larger sphere which extends to include the entire earth, its people, and ecosystems.
2
Embedded in this idea is the conviction that the responsibility humans more readily feel
for their proximate home, or their intimate ecosystem, weakens with distance. In spite of
scientific evidence of the interconnectedness of various far-flung environments, and the
repercussions of seemingly local choices that redound across remote geographies, humans
seem to persist in their concern for the apparently immediate and proximate at the expense
of concern for the apparently removed or distant.
This type of observation has long been made in various spheres of inquiry, particularly in
geographically-interested fields, perhaps most famously in social-science circles in which the
phenomenon is called the “Gravity model” (Reilly 1931).
3
Suffice to say, the observation that
for humans the primary sphere of concern is the most proximate and that more peripheral
spheres receive more marginal attention is not new. In eco-theological discourse, Michael
Northcott suggests as much with his discussions of “parochial ecology” (Northcott 2015).
This dynamic takes on particular importance in the study of religion, especially
when considering Thomas Tweed’s thesis from his critical-geographical study of religion,
Crossing and Dwelling (Tweed 2006). If, as he suggests, religion amounts to a kind of
Religions 2021, 12, 891. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12100891 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/religions