Single lead ST-segment recovery: A simple, reliable
measure of successful fibrinolysis after acute
myocardial infarction
Mushabbar A. Syed, MD,
a
Steven Borzak, MD,
b
Abed Asfour, MD,
a
Madhavi Gunda, MD,
a
Omar Obeidat, MD,
a
Sabina A. Murphy, MPH,
c
Raymond J. Gibbons, MD,
d
Steven G. Gourlay, MBBS, PhD,
e
Hal V. Barron, MD,
e
W. Douglas Weaver, MD,
a
and Michael Hudson, MD, MHS
a
Detroit, Mich, Atlantis, Fla, Boston, Mass, Rochester,
Minn, and San Francisco, Calif
Background Successful reperfusion after acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction improves prognosis. Among the
different electrocardiographic markers of reperfusion, sum ST resolution is considered the hallmark of reperfusion, but is
cumbersome to use.
Methods To assess the usefulness of a single lead ST resolution at 90 minutes after fibrinolysis compared with the
sum ST resolution in predicting Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade 3 flow, we used prospectively collected
data from the Limitation of Myocardial Injury Following Thrombolysis in Acute Myocardial Infarction (LIMIT-AMI) study. All
patients had electrocardiograms recorded at presentation and 90 minutes and a coronary angiogram 90 minutes after
fibrinolysis.
Results Infarction artery patency was assessed in 238 patients with 4 different ST resolution criteria: single lead ST
resolution 50% and 70% and sum ST resolution 50% and 70%. The most sensitive criteria for TIMI grade 3 flow
was single lead ST resolution 50% (sensitivity rate, 70%; specificity rate, 54%), whereas sum ST resolution 70% was
most the specific criteria (sensitivity rate, 45%; specificity rate, 79%). The proportion of patients with TIMI grade 3 flow
was similar in all 4 ST resolution groups (P = .84). Pre-discharge infarction size and ejection fraction were also similar.
No single lead or sum lead measure of ST resolution was significantly associated with an increased risk of death, heart
failure, or reinfarction.
Conclusion We propose that single lead ST-resolution 50% as an optimal electrocardiographic indicator for suc-
cessful reperfusion 90 minutes after fibrinolysis. This simple electrocardiographic measure should be combined with bed-
side clinical and hemodynamic assessment to optimize decision making after fibrinolysis. (Am Heart J 2004;147:
275– 80.)
Achieving optimal Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarc-
tion (TIMI) grade 3 coronary blood flow after fibrinoly-
sis preserves left ventricular function and improves
survival in patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial
infarction (MI).
1
In patients receiving fibrinolytic
agents, accurate assessment of reperfusion success and
infarction artery patency is useful prognostically and
may identify patients at high risk who are likely to
benefit from rescue percutaneous coronary interven-
tion (PCI).
2,3
To appropriately identify suitable candi-
dates for rescue PCI, several noninvasive bedside mea-
sures have been studied, including chest pain
resolution, cardiac biomarkers, and different electro-
cardiographic (ECG) changes.
4–8
Among the different
ECG indicators of reperfusion, ST segment resolution
has been most studied and is currently considered the
hallmark of successful reperfusion and prognosis.
9 –12
Different ST resolution criteria with continuous or
serial ECG monitoring at multiple points after fibrinoly-
sis have been proposed to assess reperfusion success.
Schro ¨der et al
13
compared different degrees of ST reso-
lution and found 70% resolution at 180 minutes after
fibrinolysis to be an optimal predictor of outcome after
acute MI. In the ECG ischemia monitoring substudy of
From the
a
Henry Ford Heart and Vascular Institute, Detroit, Mich,
b
Florida Cardiovas-
cular Research, LC, Atlantis, Fla,
c
TIMI Study Group, Brigham and Women’s Hospital,
Boston, Mass,
d
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn, and
e
Genentech, South San Francisco,
Calif.
Supported by Genentech Inc. Drs Gourlay and Barron are employees of Genentech
Inc.
Submitted May 14, 2003; accepted August 25, 2003.
Reprint requests: Michael Hudson, MD, MHS, FACC, Henry Ford Heart and Vascular
Institute, (K-14), 2799 West Grand Blvd. Detroit, MI 48202.
E-mail: mhudson1@hfhs.org
0002-8703/$ - see front matter
© 2004, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2003.08.010