INT J TUBERC LUNG DIS 9(10):1088–1096
© 2005 The Union
Development and evaluation of a new chest radiograph reading
and recording system for epidemiological surveys of
tuberculosis and lung disease
S. Den Boon,*
†‡
E. D. Bateman,
§
D. A. Enarson,
¶
M. W. Borgdorff
†‡
S. Verver,
‡
C. J. Lombard,
#
E. Irusen,**
N. Beyers,* N. W. White
§†
*Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Desmond Tutu TB Centre, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town,
South Africa;
†
Department of Infectious Diseases, Tropical Medicine and AIDS, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam,
‡
KNCV Tuberculosis Foundation, The Hague, The Netherlands;
§
Division of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine,
University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa;
¶
International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease,
Paris, France;
#
Biostatistics Unit, Medical Research Council, Cape Town, ** Department of Internal Medicine,
SUMMARY
Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
OBJECTIVE: The development and evaluation of a new
chest radiograph reading and recording system (CRRS)
for community surveys of tuberculosis (TB) and lung
disease.
DESIGN: An experienced pulmonologist read 2608
chest X-rays (CXRs) performed as part of a TB preva-
lence survey using the newly developed CRRS. The
kappa () for inter-reader agreement was calculated
after a second reader reported on a stratified random
sample of 810 (31%) of the 2608 CXRs. The for intra-
reader agreement was calculated from the repeated re-
porting of a stratified random sample of 104 CXRs.
RESULTS: The agreement between the two readers
was 0.69 (95%CI 0.64–0.74) for abnormalities consis-
tent with TB and 0.47 (95%CI 0.42–0.53) for any ab-
normalities. The for intra-reader agreement was 0.90
(95%CI 0.81–0.99) for abnormalities consistent with
TB and 0.85 (95%CI 0.74–0.95) for any abnormalities.
CONCLUSION: This standardised method for CXR
reading and recording provides satisfactory inter- and
intra-reader agreement, making it suitable for surveys of
TB and other forms of lung disease in the community. Its
use will permit comparisons of results obtained in differ-
ent surveys.
KEY WORDS: tuberculosis; chest radiograph; kappa;
dual reading; reproducibility
THE INTERPRETATION of chest X-rays (CXRs),
because of its subjectivity, is highly dependent on the
reader. Inter-observer differences and lack of consis-
tency of reporting,
1–3
even by the same reader, has led
chest radiography, although widely used as a diagnos-
tic tool, to be not well regarded as a tool in tubercu-
losis (TB) surveys. Current practice is to minimise the
effects of observer error by employing a second or
third reader and then seek consensus,
4–11
which is
both costly and effort-intensive. For the study of oc-
cupational lung disease, the use of radiology for both
clinical purposes and research has been greatly im-
proved by the use of a standardised reading method-
ology utilising reference radiographs, and a system of
accreditation for readers.
12,13
We hypothesised that the use of a method similar
to that used for occupational lung disease might be of
benefit to researchers and even to practitioners evalu-
ating and recording CXRs on individual subjects
for the purposes of identifying and systematically re-
cording abnormalities. By transforming observed pat-
terns into categorical and semi-quantitative forms,
these may be used for both screening and follow-up
of patients. We report here the development and first
results obtained using a chest radiograph reading
and recording system (CRRS) that employs prin-
ciples similar to those used in the International Union
Against Cancer and the International Labour Or-
ganization (UICC/ILO) and the National Institute
for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
12,13
radiographic reading methods and may be used in
conjunction with the UICC/ILO reference radiographs
and scoring system for occupational diseases, but
Correspondence to: Ms Saskia Den Boon, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Des-
mond Tutu TB Centre, Stellenbosch University, P O Box 19063, 7505 Tygerberg, Cape Town, South Africa. Tel: (+27) 21
938 9177. Fax: (+27) 21 938 9138. e-mail: 14321823@sun.ac.za
Article submitted 7 June 2005. Final version accepted 1 July 2005.
†
deceased.