materials
Review
Green Concrete for a Circular Economy: A Review on
Sustainability, Durability, and Structural Properties
Abathar Al-Hamrani
1
, Murat Kucukvar
2,
* , Wael Alnahhal
1
, Elsadig Mahdi
2
and Nuri C. Onat
3
Citation: Al-Hamrani, A.; Kucukvar,
M.; Alnahhal, W.; Mahdi, E.; Onat,
N.C. Green Concrete for a Circular
Economy: A Review on Sustainability,
Durability, and Structural Properties.
Materials 2021, 14, 351.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14020351
Received: 24 December 2020
Accepted: 5 January 2021
Published: 12 January 2021
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neu-
tral with regard to jurisdictional clai-
ms in published maps and institutio-
nal affiliations.
Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. Li-
censee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and con-
ditions of the Creative Commons At-
tribution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).
1
Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar;
aa1205725@student.qu.edu.qa (A.A.-H.); wael.alnahhal@qu.edu.qa (W.A.)
2
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, Qatar University,
Doha 2713, Qatar; elsadigms@qu.edu.qa
3
Qatar Transportation and Traffic Safety Center, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar; onat@qu.edu.qa
* Correspondence: mkucukvar@qu.edu.qa; Tel.: +974-4403-4332
Abstract: A primary concern of conventional Portland cement concrete (PCC) is associated with
the massive amount of global cement and natural coarse aggregates (NCA) consumption, which
causes depletion of natural resources on the one hand and ecological problems on the other. As a
result, the concept of green concrete (GC), by replacing cement with supplementary cementitious
materials (SCMs) such as ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS), fly ash (FA), silica fume
(SF), and metakaolin (MK), or replacing NCA with recycled coarse aggregates, can play an essential
role in addressing the environmental threat of PCC. Currently, there is a growing body of literature
that emphasizes the importance of implementing GC in concrete applications. Therefore, this paper
has conducted a systematic literature review through the peer-reviewed literature database Scopus.
A total of 114 papers were reviewed that cover the following areas: (1) sustainability benefits of
GC, (2) mechanical behavior of GC in terms of compressive strength, (3) durability properties of GC
under several environmental exposures, (4) structural performance of GC in large-scale reinforced
beams under shear and flexure, and (5) analytical investigation that compares the GC shear capacities
of previously tested beams with major design codes and proposed models. Based on this review,
the reader will be able to select the optimum replacement level of cement with one of the SCMs
to achieve a certain concrete strength range that would suit a certain concrete application. Also,
the analysis of durability performance revealed that the addition of SCMs is not recommended in
concrete exposed to a higher temperature than 400
◦
C. Moreover, combining GGBFS with FA in a
concrete mix was noticed to be superior to PCC in terms of long-term resistance to sulfate attack. The
single most striking observation to emerge from the data comparison of the experimentally tested
beams with the available concrete shear design equations is that the beams having up to 70% of FA as
a replacement to OPC or up to 100% of RCA as a replacement to NCA were conservatively predicted
by the equations of Japan Society of Civil Engineers (JSCE-1997), the American Concrete Institute
(ACI 318-19), and the Canadian Standards Association (CSA-A23.3-14).
Keywords: green concrete; cement; ground granulated blast furnace slag; fly ash; silica fume;
metakaolin
1. Introduction
With the increasing risks of climate change and the depletion of natural resources due
to their utilization in the construction industry, sustainability has gained wide importance
and the term circular economy (CE) has emerged as one of the most important factors
leading to sustainable development [1]. In contrast to the prevailing traditional economy
system, which is based on a methodology of make, use, and finally, dispose of, the CE aims
at continuous use of products by recycling and reusing instead of disposing to create a
closed-loop system and reduce the resource consumption [2].
Materials 2021, 14, 351. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14020351 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/materials