Inhalation of LPS induces inflammatory airway responses mimicking characteristics of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Magnus Korsgren 1 , Margareta Linden 2 , Neil Entwistle 3 , Jason Cook 3 , Per Wollmer 4 , Morgan Andersson 5 , Bengt Larsson 1,2 and Lennart Greiff 5 1 Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Lund University Hospital, Lund, 2 AstraZeneca R&D Lund, Lund, Sweden, 3 AstraZeneca R&D Charnwood, Loughborough, UK, 4 Department of Clinical Physiology, Lund University Hospital, Malmo¨, and 5 Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden Correspondence Lennart Greiff, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Lund University Hospital, SE-221 85 Lund, Sweden E-mail: lennart.greiff@live.se Accepted for publication Received 5 March 2011; accepted 6 September 2011 Key words airway inflammation; C-reactive protein; endotoxin; neutrophil elastase; neutrophils; tumour necrosis factor-a Summary Aim: Inhalation of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) produces both systemic and pulmonary inflammatory responses. The aim of this study was to further characterize the response to LPS in order to develop a human model suitable for early testing of drug candidates developed for the treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Materials: Blood and induced sputum were obtained 4, 24 and 48 h following inhalation of saline and LPS (5 and 50 lg). Blood was analysed for C-reactive protein (CRP), a 1 -antitrypsin and neutrophils leucocytes, and sputum was analysed for biomarkers of neutrophil inflammation and remodelling activities, i.e. neutrophil elastase (NE) protein activity and a 1 -antitrypsin. Levels of tumour necrosis factor-a (TNFa) were measured in both blood and sputum. Urine was collected 0–24 and 24–48 h postchallenge, and desmosine, a biomarker of elastin degradation, was measured. Results: Lipopolysaccharide inhalation induced dose-dependent flu-like symptoms and increases in plasma CRP and a 1 -antitrypsin as well as increases in blood neutrophil leucocyte numbers. Furthermore, LPS produced increases in sputum TNFa and sputum NE activity. Urine levels of desmosine were unaffected by the LPS challenge. All subjects recovered 48 h postchallenge, and indices of inflammatory activity were significantly lower at this observation point cf 24 h postchallenge. Conclusion: Inhalation of LPS in healthy volunteers can be used as a safe and stable model of neutrophil inflammation. Blood plasma and sputum indices can be employed to monitor the response to LPS. We suggest that this model may be used for initial human studies of novel COPD-active drugs. Introduction Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) afflicts about 5% of the western population. Despite its severity, the condition is poorly treated, reflecting a lack of efficient COPD-active drugs. Human models suitable for early and fast evaluation of novel drug candidates with a potential to speed up drug development in this field are warranted. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), or endotoxin, is a constituent of the outer cell membrane of gram-negative bacteria. Oral inhalation of LPS in man evokes airway inflammation charac- terized by increased neutrophil activity (Michel et al., 1992, 1995, 1997; Sandstro ¨m et al., 1992; Nightingale et al., 1998a,b; Tho ¨rn & Rylander, 1998). Although there are systemic features of the response to LPS, the inflammation appears to be fully transient and repeatable. Hence, LPS challenges may have a utility for studies of the pharmacology of neutrophilic airway inflammation. In turn, such studies may be relevant to conditions characterized by neutrophilic inflammation, includ- ing COPD (Lacoste et al., 1993; Keatings & Barnes, 1997; Rutgers et al., 2000). Macrophages are regarded as one of the major players in the pathophysiology of COPD, including a role in airway remod- elling activities (McLaughlin & Tueller, 1971; Barnes, 2004). LPS stimulates macrophages, leading to the production of many pro-inflammatory factors, including tumour necrosis factor-a Clin Physiol Funct Imaging (2012) 32, pp71–79 doi: 10.1111/j.1475-097X.2011.01058.x Ó 2011 The Authors Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging Ó 2011 Scandinavian Society of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine 32, 1, 71–79 71