A b s t r a c t
At first glance, there seems to be a broad
understanding regarding business models.
However, a more thorough analysis of
existing resources paints a different picture.
The term ‘business model’ often remains
undefined and a consensus on the elements
of business models is lacking. An analysis
of various sources, such as electronic data-
bases, conference proceedings, and EM –
Electronic Markets itself supports this
statement. Nevertheless, business models
are largely believed to determine the
success of an electronic venture. To
establish some structure and to identify
the critical components of business models,
the existing definitions and approaches
were analysed and led to a model, which
differentiates six business model elements.
This model is also used to position the
articles submitted to this special issue of
EM – Electronic Markets.
A u t h o r s
Rainer Alt (Rainer.Alt@unisg.ch) is a
Senior Lecturer and Project Manager
at the Institute of Information
Management, University of St. Gallen,
Switzerland. He served as Executive
Editor of this journal with Stefan
Zbornik from 1993 to 1996 (Vol. 3 to
Vol. 6). Prior to assuming his current
position he worked for Roland Berger
Strategy Consultants in Düsseldorf,
Germany.
Hans-Dieter Zimmermann
(Hans-Dieter.Zimmermann@unisg.ch)
is a Senior Research Associate at
the mcm institute for Media and
Communications Management at the
University of St. Gallen, Switzerland.
He is managing the Competence
Center Electronic Markets (CCEM),
which has funded the editorial staff of
EM – Electronic Markets for the last
10 years.
INTRODUCTION
Business models are perhaps the most
discussed and least understood terms
and aspects in the areas of eBusiness,
eCommerce and eMarkets. Much talk
revolves around how traditional
business models are being changed
and the future of e-based business
models. Despite an intuitive under-
standing that seems to be widespread,
a more thorough analysis reveals a
confusing and incomplete picture of
the dimensions, perspectives, and core
issues of these business models. A
reading of scientic, as well as non-
scientic publications, presents a broad
variety of understandings: auctions
as a business model; B2B or B2C as
business models; a subscription-based
business model; a business model
understood as ‘revenue model’; verti-
cal portal as a business model; and
e-commerce as a business model, etc.
Rappa (2000) provides a compre-
hensive overview of the different views
on business models. He identies 29
different types of business models,
ordered in nine categories.
We feel that a common-sense under-
standing, a denition, or a taxonomy
regarding business models are all
lacking today. Furthermore, we nd
that there is virtually no discussion
on this topic. However, the relevance
of a sound business model seems
to be undisputed. Many failures of
‘eVentures’ are due to their missing, ill-
dened or ill business model (Vickers
2000: 58).
Although resolving this dialectic
situation is elusive at the current stage
of discussion and research, we aim to
shed some light and structure to this
eld. First, we present some evidence
with a simple analysis of the diffusion
of the term business model. In the
second step, we present a variety of
business model denitions and show
the dimensions involved in the dis-
cussions about business models. These
denitions will be used to suggest
a working denition for business
models, which also serves to position
the articles in this issue.
BUSINESS MODELS IN LITERATURE
The term business model is widely
used in both academia and practice.
Importance is usually regarded as high,
since a sound business model seems
to inuence the (potential) revenues
and the future success of the eBusiness
initiative. Business models determine
participation of partners, channel con-
icts, and revenues etc. However, there
are multiple indications that neither
the understanding nor the elements
of business models are broadly avail-
able. In 1995, Shipley remarked that
‘many enterprises do not have clearly
articulated or presented business
models and goals; nor are they static’.
Viscio and Pasternack claimed in 1996
Preface: Introduction to Special Section –
Business Models
RAINER ALT AND HANS-DIETER ZIMMERMANN
Copyright
©
2001 Electronic Markets
Volume 11 (1): 3–9. www.electronicmarkets.org
Keywords: business media, business models
SPECIAL SECTION: BUSINESS MODELS