Proceeding Paper
Extracts of Non-Microcystin-Producing Cyanobacteria Affect
the Plant Cytoskeleton and Cell Cycle
†
Dimitris Pappas
1,
* , Ioannis-Dimosthenis S. Adamakis
2
, Spyros Gkelis
1
and Emmanuel Panteris
1,
*
Citation: Pappas, D.; Adamakis,
I.-D.S.; Gkelis, S.; Panteris, E. Extracts
of Non-Microcystin-Producing
Cyanobacteria Affect the Plant
Cytoskeleton and Cell Cycle. Biol. Life
Sci. Forum 2021, 4, 85. https://
doi.org/10.3390/IECPS2020-08722
Academic Editor:
Yoselin Benitez-Alfonso
Published: 1 December 2020
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral
with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional affil-
iations.
Copyright: © 2020 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).
1
Department of Botany, School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, GR-54124 Thessaloniki, Greece;
sgkelis@bio.auth.gr
2
Section of Botany, Department of Biology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, GR-15784 Athens,
Greece; iadamaki@biol.uoa.gr
* Correspondence: dtpappas@bio.auth.gr (D.P.); epanter@bio.auth.gr(E.P.);Tel.: +30-2310-998908 (E.P.)
† Presented at the 1st International Electronic Conference on Plant Science, 1–15 December 2021; Available
online: https://iecps2020.sciforum.net/.
Abstract: Studies on the toxicity of cyanobacterial products on plant cytoskeleton have so far focused
on the effects of microcystins (MCs), cyanobacterial toxins that inhibit protein phosphatases 1 and
2A, enzymes which are involved in plant cytoskeleton (microtubules and F-actin) organization and
cell cycle progression. In this study, we investigated the effects of extracts from two non-microcystin-
producing (NMP) cyanobacterial strains, Microcystis viridis TAU-MAC 1810 and Planktothrix agardhii
TAU-MAC 0514, on the cytoskeleton and cell cycle of Oryza sativa (rice) root cells. Rice seedling roots
were exposed for various time periods (1, 12 and 24 h) to aqueous extracts of the aforementioned
strains. Treated root tips underwent either immunostaining for α-tubulin or staining of F-actin
with fluorescent phalloidin, and DAPI staining of DNA. Fluorescent specimens were observed by
confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Corrected total cell fluorescence (CTCF) was measured to
quantify F-actin disorder. To assess cell cycle alterations, cell cycle stage frequencies were calculated.
In addition, Evans Blue staining was applied to determine dead cells. Treatment with the extracts
affected microtubules and F-actin, as well as the cell cycle. These findings suggest that bioactive
cyanobacterial compounds, apart from MCs, can disrupt the cytoskeleton and cell cycle progression
in plant cells.
Keywords: cell cycle; cyanobacteria; cytoskeleton; F-actin; microtubules
1. Introduction
Microcystins (MCs) are monocyclic heptapeptides, produced by several species of
cyanobacteria [1]. They are potent hepatotoxins [2], but are also known to negatively affect
plants [3,4]. In particular, the plant cytoskeleton (F-actin and microtubules) is an established
target of MC variants [5,6], the toxicity of which lies in their ability to inhibit protein
phosphatases 1 (PP1) and 2A (PP2A) [7], which participate in cytoskeleton organization [8]
and cell cycle progression [9].
To date, extracts from cyanobacterial strains that produce MCs have been extensively
used to study cytoskeletal and other physiological defects [3,5,10]. In this study, we
investigated the effects of extracts from non-microcystin-producing (NMP) cyanobacterial
strains on Oryza sativa (rice) meristematic root cells, focusing on the plant cytoskeleton and
cell cycle.
2. Experiments
2.1. Culture of Cyanobacterial Strains and Biomass Extraction
Two NMP cyanobacterial strains of the TAU-MAC culture collection, Microcystis viridis
TAU-MAC 1810 and Planktothrix aghardii TAU-MAC 0514 [11,12], were cultured using BG-
11 medium in a 12:12 h light:dark cycle under white fluorescent lamps. Biomass was
Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2021, 4, 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECPS2020-08722 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/blsf