Kinetic Analysis of Ca
2+
/K
+
Selectivity of an Ion Channel by Single-Binding-Site Models
D. Gradmann
1
, E. Johannes
2
, U.-P. Hansen
3
1
Biophysical Laboratory, A.-v.-Haller-Institute for Plant Sciences, University of Go ¨ttingen, Untere Karspu ¨le 2, D-37073 Go ¨ttingen, Germany
2
The Plant Laboratory, Biology Department, University of York, P.O. Box 373, York YO1 5YW, UK
3
Institut fu ¨r Angewandte Physik der Universita ¨t, Olshausenstr. 40, D-24098 Kiel, Germany
Received: 19 February 1997/Revised: 19 May 1997
Abstract. Current-voltage relationships of a cation chan-
nel in the tonoplast of Beta vulgaris, as recorded in so-
lutions with different activities of Ca
2+
and K
+
(from
Johannes & Sanders 1995, J. Membrane Biol. 146:211–
224), have been reevaluated for Ca
2+
/K
+
selectivi-
ty. Since conversion of reversal voltages to permeability
ratios by constant field equations is expected to fail be-
cause different ions do not move independently through
a channel, the data have been analyzed with kinetic chan-
nel models instead. Since recent structural information
on K
+
channels show one short and predominant con-
striction, selectivity models with only one binding site
are assumed here to reflect this region kinetically. The
rigid-pore model with a main binding site between two
energy barriers (nine free parameters) had intrinsic prob-
lems to describe the observed current-saturation at large
(negative) voltages. The alternative, dynamic-pore
model uses a selectivity filter in which the binding site
alternates its orientation (empty, or occupied by either
Ca
2+
or K
+
) between the cytoplasmic side and the lu-
minal side within a fraction of the electrical distance and
in a rate-limiting fashion. Fits with this model describe
the data well. The fits yield about a 10% electrical dis-
tance of the selectivity filter, located about 5% more
cytoplasmic than the electrical center. For K
+
transloca-
tion, reorientation of the unoccupied binding site (with a
preference of about 6:5 to face the lumenal side) is rate
limiting. For Ca
2+
, the results show high affinity to the
binding site and low translocation rates (<1% of the K
+
translocation rate). With the fitted model Ca
2+
entry
through the open channel has been calculated for physi-
ological conditions. The model predicts a unitary open
channel current of about 100 fA which is insensitive to
cytoplasmic Ca
2+
concentrations (between 0.1 and 1 M)
and which shows little sensitivity to the voltage across
the tonoplast.
Key words: Calcium — Channel — Current-voltage
curves — Selectivity filter — Rate theory — Kinetic
model
Introduction
Entry of Ca
2+
into the cytoplasm through ion channels is
an important subject in contemporary physiology.
Strictly Ca
2+
-selective channels have not been identified
in plants yet. There are, however, many reports about
channels in plant membranes which allow Ca
2+
perme-
ation to a small but sufficient extent. For a quantitative
estimate of this portion, it was common usage to measure
current-voltage relationships (IV-curves) in the presence
of K
+
and Ca
2+
and to convert the obtained reversal
voltages to relative permeabilities by constant field equa-
tions (e.g., Bertl & Slayman, 1992; Johannes, Brosnan &
Sanders, 1992; Ding & Pickard, 1993; Gelli & Blum-
wald, 1993; Pin ˜eros & Tester, 1994; Allen & Sanders,
1995, 1996; Schulz-Lessdorf & Hedrich, 1995; Ward,
Pei & Schroeder, 1995). This approach is based on the
assumption of independent movement of different ion
species (Goldman, 1943), which has been questioned to
be valid for individual channels where competition be-
tween various transportees can rather be expected (Hille,
1992; Gradmann, 1996). An explicit treatment, based on
rate-theory, suffered from complexity, because channels
have widely been accepted to have several binding sites
in series (Hille & Schwarz, 1978). This notion was
mainly based on flux-coupling ratios and anomalous
mole fraction effects. Nevertheless, the rigid-pore model
with several binding sites (energy wells) separated by Correspondence to: D. Gradmann
J. Membrane Biol. 159, 169–178 (1997) The Journal of
Membrane
Biology
© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1997