minerals
Article
Reaction and Alteration of Mudstone with Ordinary Portland
Cement and Low Alkali Cement Pore Fluids
Keith Bateman * , Yuki Amano, Mitsuru Kubota, Yuji Ohuchi and Yukio Tachi
Citation: Bateman, K.; Amano, Y.;
Kubota, M.; Ohuchi, Y.; Tachi,Y.
Reaction and Alteration of Mudstone
with Ordinary Portland Cement and
Low Alkali Cement Pore Fluids.
Minerals 2021, 11, 588. https://
doi.org/10.3390/min11060588
Academic Editors: Ana María
Fernández, Stephan Kaufhold,
Markus Olin, Lian-Ge Zheng,
Paul Wersin and James Wilson
Received: 13 April 2021
Accepted: 26 May 2021
Published: 31 May 2021
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral
with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional affil-
iations.
Copyright: © 2021 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).
Radionuclide Migration Research Group, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Ibaraki 319-1194, Japan;
amano.yuki@jaea.go.jp (Y.A.); kubota.mitsuru@jaea.go.jp (M.K.); ohuchi.yuji@jaea.go.jp (Y.O.);
tachi.yukio@jaea.go.jp (Y.T.)
* Correspondence: bateman.keith@jaea.go.jp
Abstract: The construction of a repository for the geological disposal of radioactive waste will
utilize cement-based materials. Following closure, resaturation will result in the development of
a highly alkaline porewater. The alkaline fluid will migrate and react with host rock, producing
a chemically disturbed zone (CDZ) around the repository. To understand how these conditions
may evolve, a series of batch and flow experiments were conducted with Horonobe mudstone and
fluids representative of the alkaline leachates expected from a cementitious repository. Both ordinary
Portland cement (OPC) and low alkali cement (LAC) leachates were examined. The impact of the
LAC leachates was more limited than the OPC leachates, with experiments using the LAC leachate
showing the least reaction and lowest long-term pH of the different leachate types. The reaction
was dominated by primary mineral dissolution, and in the case of OPC leachates, precipitation of
secondary calcium-silicate-hydrate (C-S-H) phases. Flow experiments revealed that precipitation of
the secondary phases was restricted to close to the initial contact zone of the fluids and mudstone. The
experimental results demonstrate that a combination of both batch and flow-through experiments
can provide the insights required for the understanding of the key geochemical interactions and the
impact of transport.
Keywords: radioactive waste; cement-clay interaction; OPC; LAC; alkaline leachate
1. Introduction
The construction of a repository for geological disposal of radioactive waste will by
necessity include the use of cementitious materials in a multiplicity of ways, such as fillers,
liners, plugs, and seals [1–4]. Ordinary Portland cement (OPC)-based materials will be
extensively used in the construction, and following closure, groundwater will saturate the
repository and the use of OPC will result in the development of highly alkaline porewater
(pH > 12.5), [5,6]. The alkaline fluid will migrate and react with the host rock to form a
chemically disturbed zone (CDZ) around the repository [2]. A series of chemical gradients
will develop over time and distance from the repository, disturbing the pH, redox, and fluid
chemistry of the migrating fluid. It is important, particularly in the case of a radioactive
waste repository, to understand the evolution of the CDZ in both time and space and
subsequent impacts on the behavior and transport of any radionuclides in the CDZ.
The extent of the CDZ, beyond the host rock-cement interface, will depend upon
several factors with both physical and chemical properties, i.e., host rock mineralogy, poros-
ity/permeability, fracture density, groundwater composition, flow rates, and chemical
buffering capacity. Previous studies have shown that in the host rock, silicate minerals
dissolve in the highly alkaline pore fluid [2,7,8], followed by the precipitation of secondary
minerals (calcium-silicate–hydrate, calcium-aluminum-silicate-hydrate (C-S-H, C-A-S-H),
calcite) and aluminosilicates (zeolites, feldspars, feldspathoids) [9]. Other authors [10–12]
have reported the interactions between cement pore fluids and argillaceous rocks, which
demonstrated the alteration of argillaceous rocks by the high pH fluids and the buffering of
Minerals 2021, 11, 588. https://doi.org/10.3390/min11060588 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/minerals