CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS
Predisposing Factors of Bile Duct Injury After
Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization
(TACE) for Hepatic Malignancy
Jeong-Sik Yu, Ki Whang Kim, Mi-Gyoung Jeong, Deok Hee Lee, Mi-Suk Park,
Sang-Wook Yoon
Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine,
YongDong Severance Hospital, 146-92 Dogok-Dong, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul 135-270, South Korea
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the predisposing
factors of bile duct injury after transcatheter arterial chemo-
embolization (TACE) for treatment of hepatic malignancy.
For patients (n = 31) with TACE-related bile duct injuries
during a 36-month period, final diagnoses of the tumor, the
liver profile, presence of portal vein thrombosis, total num-
ber and mode of the TACE just before the development of
bile duct injury were compared, respectively with those of
patients without bile duct injury (n = 234) after TACE. The
incidence of bile duct injury was higher in the patients with
non-hepatocellular tumors than in patients with hepatocellu-
lar carcinoma ( p 0.01), and higher in Child-Pugh class A
patients than in B or C patients ( p 0.01). Segmental or
subsegmental TACE tended to induce bile duct injury more
frequently than the proximal TACE ( p = 0.01). Portal vein
thrombosis, the total number of TACEs, total amount of
iodized oil, and the usage of gelatin sponge were not closely
related to bile duct injuries after TACE ( p 0.05). It was
concluded that the chance of bile duct injury after TACE is
increased in non-cirrhotic livers with good liver profile and
to the more selective embolization of distal arterial branches.
Key words: Bile ducts, injuries—Liver, CT—Liver, necro-
sis—Liver neoplasms—Chemotherapeutic infusion
Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been
generally used for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
and less frequently for other malignant tumors in the liver
[1–5]. As a complication of TACE, bile duct injury has been
reported intermittently since the introduction of hepatic ar-
terial embolization therapy [6 –10]. Small embolic material
diameter [7] and a repeated number of TACEs [10] were
suggested to be related to ischemic bile duct injuries. The
incidence of bile duct injury after TACE or hepatic arterial
infusion chemotherapy was 12.5% in an autopsy series [9].
However, the incidence was very low (in the range of 0.9%–
2.1%) of those in some large-series follow-up CT studies
[10, 11].
As a result of developments of angiographic techniques
capable of high-resolution digital subtraction imaging and
coaxial catheter systems capable of selecting smaller arterial
branches, the concept of selective TACE to minimize hepatic
parenchymal injury and preserve liver function has been
generally accepted and standardized [3, 12]. However, rou-
tine TACE procedures designed to embolize selectively have
frequently been associated with bile duct injury and some-
what unpredictably during follow-up imaging studies. To
establish a safety guideline and predict the patients’ progno-
sis after the procedure, the predisposing factors of the bile
duct injuries, which could be a source of superimposed
infection and septicemia after TACE procedures, needed
clarification in the era of standardized mode of embolization
therapy for hepatic malignancy.
Materials and Methods
From Dec. 1995 to Nov. 1998 a total of 346 consecutive patients
underwent one or more sessions of TACE for the control of liver
malignancy, including hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 328), chol-
angiocarcinoma (n = 5), primary malignant fibrous histiocytoma (n
= 1), metastases from stomach cancer (n = 4), colorectal cancer (n
= 3), pancreatic cancer (n = 1), gallbladder cancer (n = 1),
malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumor (n = 1), and gastrointes-
tinal carcinoid tumor (n = 2). The routine protocol of TACE in our
institution includes 1–20 mL of iodized oil (Lipiodol; Andre-
Guerbet, Aulnay-sous-Bois, France) and 10 –50 mg of doxorubicin
hydrochloride (Adriamycin: Kyowa Hakko Kogyo, Tokyo, Japan) Correspondence to: J.-Sik Yu
Cardio V ascular
and Interventional
Radiology
© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2002 Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol (2002) 25:270 –274
Published Online: 3 June 2002 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-001-0049-z