materials
Article
Modeling of Curvilinear Steel Rod Structures Based on
Minimal Surfaces
Jolanta Dzwierzynska * and Igor Labuda
Citation: Dzwierzynska, J.; Labuda,
I. Modeling of Curvilinear Steel Rod
Structures Based on Minimal Surfaces.
Materials 2021, 14, 6826.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14226826
Academic Editor: Georgios Savaidis
Received: 13 September 2021
Accepted: 8 November 2021
Published: 12 November 2021
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral
with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional affil-
iations.
Copyright: © 2021 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).
Department of Architectural Design and Engineering Graphics,
Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Architecture, Rzeszow University of Technology, Al.
Powstancow Warszawy 12, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland; labuda@prz.edu.pl
* Correspondence: joladz@prz.edu.pl
Abstract: The article deals with shaping effective curvilinear steel rod roof structures using genetic
algorithms by implementing them for the analysis of various case studies in order to find new and
efficient structures with positive characteristics. The structures considered in this article are created
on the basis of the Enneper surface and minimal surfaces stretched on four arcs. On the Enneper
surface, a single layer grid is used, while on the other surfaces, two-layer ones. The Enneper form
structure with four supports and the division into an even number of parts along the perimeter of the
covered place proved to be the most efficient, and the research showed that small modifications of
the initial base surface in order to adapt the structure to the roof function did not significantly affect
its effectiveness. However, the analysis and comparison of single and double-shell rod structures
based on minimal surfaces stretched on four arcs have shown that a single-shell structure is much
more effective than a double one. The paper considers the theoretical aspects of shaping effective
structures, taking their masses as the optimization criterion. The optimization helped to choose the
best solutions due to structures’ shapes and topologies. However, the obtained, optimized results
can find practical applications after conducting physical tests.
Keywords: engineering materials; engineering structures; optimization; genetic algorithms; para-
metric design; shaping structures; curvilinear steel rod structure; modeling structures; Enneper
surface; Grasshopper
1. Introduction
The paper deals with the use of steel as the structural material for modeling curvilinear
rod structures. The systematics of steel rod structures is quite complex as they can be
differentiated due to their function, shape, kind of material used, as well as prefabrication
methods. However, due to their overall shape, that is, the shape of the surface they form,
the following types of steel rod structures can be distinguished: flat, single-curved as
well as double-curved. On the other hand, in terms of their grid systems, the steel rod
structures can be divided into single-layer and multi-layer structures. Geometric grids are
characterized by a large topological diversity. However, single-layer coverings usually
occur in a curved form, whereas multi-layer coverings are more often applied as flat
ones [1]. Modeling/shaping of any steel rod structure can be defined as the continuous
optimization of its form and shape due to assumed criteria and constraints. From the
architectural point of view, during shaping, the main emphasis is put on functionality and
aesthetics, whereas from a structural aspect, shaping can be treated as determination of the
system that meets the assumed criteria for strength, which are specified by standards [2–5].
However, architectural and structural shaping criteria are interdependent [6].
Moreover, as far as curvilinear steel rod roof structures are concerned, they are subjected
to the specific geometric shaping criteria for this kind of structure. These criteria relate
mainly to geometric parameters of the structure’s module, its height, span, and topology [7].
Materials 2021, 14, 6826. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14226826 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/materials