Force fields of the modern: The symbolic contestation of power
Page 1 of 31
PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights
Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in
Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).
Subscriber: OUP-Reference Gratis Access; date: 15 October 2021
Subject: Psychology, Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience
Online Publication Date: Oct 2021 DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198813781.013.39
Force fields of the modern: The symbolic contestation
of power
Prem Poddar
The Oxford Handbook of Human Symbolic Evolution
Edited by Nathalie Gontier, Andy Lock, and Chris Sinha
Abstract and Keywords
The essentially contested notion of the modern, and its cognate form “modernity,” have a
long intellectual history. The emergence and dissemination of the idea of Western moder
nity was sometimes forcibly imposed, sometimes partially accepted, and sometimes re
sisted at different levels around the globe. Recent thinking has produced qualifiers and
prefixes such as “unfinished,” “post-,” “late,” “inevitable,” “contra-,” “alternative,” or “dif
ferential” in relation to modernity, to signal the striations in approaches, interpretations,
and positionings towards what is seen as an umbrella term to describe the various possi
bilities that can be brought to bear while considering contentions in contemporary theory
and praxis. The social, economic, political, and cultural dimensions of this field of forces
are integral to any thinking about the symbolic contestation of power in multifarious re-
imaginings. This article charts this field mainly by looking at the colonial and postcolonial
interventions that have impacted and continue to the present day to effect and inflect cul
tures and societies, including pressing questions of climate change and cyberspace. Sec
tions are sorted under the following sub-headings: “The vortex of the modern;” “Subal
tern bodies, subversive minds;” “Communication and colonization: Re-inventing space
and time;” “Borderlands, migrations, identities;” and “Contesting and controlling cyber
space.”
Keywords: differential modernities, subalternity, subversive minds, symbolic contestation, postcolonial, migrations
and borders, semio/technosphere, digital colonialism, digital commons, pasts and futures
“Just as water, gas and electricity are brought into our houses from far off to satis
fy our needs with minimal effort, so we shall be supplied with visual and auditory
images, which will appear and disappear at a simple movement of the hand ….”
(Valéry, 1964, p. 226)