Usefulness of Short-Term Symptomatic Status as a
Predictor of Mid- and Long-Term Outcome After
Balloon Mitral Valvuloplasty
Lynette A. Yates, RN, Roger E. Peverill, MBBS, PhD, Richard W. Harper, MBBS, and
Joseph J. Smolich, MBBS, PhD
A
lthough the increase in mitral valve area pro-
duced in patients with mitral stenosis by balloon
mitral valvuloplasty (BMV) has a rapid benefit on
hemodynamics,
1–4
improvements in subjective patient
symptoms, peripheral muscle oxygenation, and exer-
cise tolerance require several months to become fully
manifest.
4–8
On this basis, this study examined the
proposition that the short-term symptomatic status of
patients after BMV, reflected in the New York Heart
Association (NYHA) classification obtained at an ini-
tial 3-month follow-up, was a predictor of longer term
outcome, independent of patient baseline characteris-
tics and procedural variables.
•••
The study population consisted of 137 consecutive
patients with mitral stenosis who underwent BMV
between December 1989 and December 1997 using
the single Inoue balloon technique.
9
Five patients
were excluded from analysis because of failure to
cross the mitral valve with the Inoue balloon (n = 3)
or incomplete data sets (n = 2). Baseline demographic
data were obtained by interview and examination of
hospital records; a baseline NYHA classification was
performed as part of the clinical workup.
Patients underwent M-mode, 2-dimensional, and
Doppler transthoracic echocardiography within 48
hours before BMV to assess mitral valve area, mitral
valve morphology, left atrial diameter, and the extent
of other valvular diseases. Measurements were per-
formed according to the recommendations of the
American Society of Echocardiography.
10
Mitral
valve area was primarily obtained with the pressure
half-time method,
11
but planimetry was used in 10%
of cases in which velocity envelopes were of less than
optimal quality. Mitral valve morphology was quan-
titated by an experienced echocardiographer using the
echocardiographic scoring system (“echo score”) of
Wilkins et al,
12
which was derived by assessing 4
morphologic characteristics (valve calcification, sub-
valvular morphology, valve thickness, and valve mo-
bility) and grading each on a scale from 0 (normal) to
4 (severely abnormal). After its introduction at our
institution in 1991, 109 patients also underwent ex-
amination with transesophageal echocardiography be-
fore BMV to exclude a left atrial thrombus. Transtho-
racic echocardiographic assessment of mitral valve
area and transmitral pressure gradient was repeated 2
days after BMV.
BMV was performed as previously described.
13
A
7.5Fr Swan-Ganz catheter was inserted to measure
pulmonary arterial pressures and thermodilution car-
diac output, while a 6Fr polymer pigtail catheter was
inserted into the left ventricle for pressure measure-
ment and ventriculography. Before and after BMV,
mitral regurgitation was graded during left ventricular
cineangiography on a scale of 0 to 4 using standard
criteria. Coronary angiography was performed in se-
lected patients based on an individual coronary artery
disease risk assessment. After atrial transseptal punc-
ture, an 8Fr transseptal catheter was advanced into the
left atrium and the mean gradient across the mitral
valve was obtained by simultaneous recordings of the
left atrial and left ventricular pressures. The mitral
valve was subsequently dilated using an Inoue balloon
catheter, with balloon size (24 to 30 mm) selected
according to patient body surface area. Cardiac output
and pressure measurements were repeated after com-
pletion of balloon dilatation. There was no occurrence
of in-hospital stroke, myocardial infarction, or death
related to the BMV procedure.
Initial follow-up after BMV was at 3 months, when
an NYHA classification was determined for use in
outcome analysis. Subsequent follow-up information
was obtained annually via mailed questionnaire or
telephone interview, or from the family doctor or
referring cardiologist in the event of no patient re-
sponse. Follow-up was concluded in March 1998,
with a follow-up period of at least 3 months unless a
prior event occurred. Median duration of follow-up
was 41 months (range 3 to 108). For patients who
died, the cause of death was obtained by examination
of hospital records or contact with the patient’s doctor.
Statistical analyses were performed using Statisti-
cal Package for the Social Sciences, version 9.0.1
(SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois). In the analysis, fol-
low-up was terminated after occurrence of an end-
point event, defined as NYHA class III or IV symp-
toms, repeat BMV, mitral valve surgery, or death from
all causes. Where several end-point events occurred,
follow-up was stopped at the first end point. Two
patients who underwent repeat BMV were included in
the analysis twice, once after an end point was reached
after initial valvuloplasty, and again after the second
procedure. Five patients who were lost to follow-up at
a median interval of 49 months (range 13 to 77) after
BMV were withdrawn from analysis as of the last
follow-up.
From the Centre for Heart and Chest Research, Department of Medi-
cine, Monash University and Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Vic-
toria, Australia. Dr. Smolich’s address is: Cardiology Unit, Monash
Medical Centre, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Austra-
lia. E-mail: joe.smolich@med.monash.edu.au. Manuscript received
May 4, 2000; revised manuscript received and accepted October
23, 2000.
912 ©2001 by Excerpta Medica, Inc. All rights reserved. 0002-9149/01/$–see front matter
The American Journal of Cardiology Vol. 87 April 1, 2001 PII S0002-9149(00)01539-3