183 DOMINIQUE CAOUETTE, JULIEN VALLÉE, AND LINDSAY LONG Kasarinlan: Philippine Journal of Third World Studies 2011 26 (1–2): 183-222 Canada’s Aid Policy and Assistance to Rural Development and Land Policies to the Philippines since the 1980s DOMINIQUE CAOUETTE, JULIEN VALLÉE, AND LINDSAY LONG ABSTRACT. Concerns over food security and agriculture are back on the agenda for many donor agencies. Canada followed the trend by declaring that food security is one of its three priority areas (CIDA 2009). While these are encouraging and welcome initiatives, one cannot avoid wondering how much Canada has learned from its past experiences, and also how much such focus is rooted in an understanding of the structural impediments and obstacles to rural development. This paper takes a long-term perspective on Canada’s official development assistance (ODA) commitment to land and rural development policies, examining the specific case of the Philippines. In doing so, the paper suggests that Canada’s commitment to land policies and agrarian reform appears driven by specific political conjunctures and moments, rather than a long-term commitment on how to address issues of rural poverty and unequal access to land and resources. So far, on land policies and rural development, the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) has talked the pro-poor talk but has failed to walk the redistribution walk. KEYWORDS. aid policy · Canada · Philippines · land policies · rural development INTRODUCTION In recent years, concerns over food security and agriculture have been back on the agenda for many donor agencies. Canada followed the trend recently by declaring that food security is one of its three priority areas (CIDA 2009). 1 In doing so, it aspires to strengthen an earlier objective declared in 2003 to increase its overall commitment to sustainable rural development (CIDA 2003). While these are encouraging and welcome initiatives, one cannot avoid wondering how much Canada has learned from its past experiences, and also how much such focus is rooted in an understanding of the structural impediments and obstacles to rural development.