ﺩﻭﺍﺯﺩﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﮐﻨﻔﺮﺍﻧﺲ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﯽ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦ ﮐﺎﻣﭙﻴﻮﺗﺮ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺷﻬﻴﺪ ﺑﻬﺸﺘﯽ، ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮑﺪﻩ ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﯽ ﺑﺮﻕ ﻭ ﮐﺎﻣﭙﻴﻮﺗﺮ، ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ، ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ، ۱ ﺗﺎ۳ ﺍﺳﻔﻨﺪ١٣٨٥ ﻣﻌﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺵ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻣﻌﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﻧﺮﻡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ﻧﺎﻇﻤﻲ * ، ﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﻳﺰﺩﻱ، ﺳﺎﻧﺎﺯ ﺣﻴﺪﺭﻱ، ﺍﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﻗﺰﻟﺒﺎﺵ، ﭘﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﻋﻤﺎﺩﻱ ¥ ﭼﻜﻴﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺩﻫﻪ ﺍﺧ ﻴ ﺮ ، ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﮔﻲ ﻧﺮﻡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭﻫﺎ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﺮﻡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻤﻨﺪﺗﺮ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻳﺎﻓﺘـﻪ ﺍﺳـﺖ. ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ، ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲ ﺭﺳﺪ ﮐﻪ ﺭﻭﺷﻬﺎﻱ ﻗﺪﻳﻤﻲ ﺟﻮﺍﺑﮕﻮﻱ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺭﺷﺪ ﮐﻨﻮﻧﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺑﮑﺎﺭﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺭﻭﺷﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﮐﻪ ﺑﻮﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﮔﻲ ﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﮐﻮﺗﺎﻫﺘﺮ ﻏﻠﺒﻪ ﮐﺮﺩ. ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﻲ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻛﻨـﺎﺭ ﮔﺬﺍﺷـﺘﻦ ﺳﻴـﺴﺘﻤﻬﺎﻱ ﻧـﺮﻡ ﺍﻓـﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﮐﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﺸﻐﻮﻝ ﺳﺮﻭﻳﺲ ﺩﻫﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﻧﺪ ، ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺴﺖ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻤﻬﺎﻱ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺼﻮﺭﺕ ﻳﮑﭙﺎﺭﭼـﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﮐﻨﺎﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻤﻬﺎ ﺑﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ. ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻟﻬﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ، ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎﺕ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻌﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﻧﺮﻡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ، ﺑﻪ ﻳﮑﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳـﻲ ﻧﺮﻡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﻌﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﻧﺮﻡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ، ﻳﮑﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻣﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ. ﻫﺪﻑ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻣﻌﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﻳﮏ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻧﺮﻡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﻌﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﺟﻬﺖ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﮐﺮﺩﻥ ﭘﺘﺎﻧـﺴﻴﻞ ﺭﻳـﺴﮏ ﻫـﺎ ﻭ ﺗـﺼﺪﻳﻖ ﮐﻴﻔﻴـﺖ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪﻱ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻲ ﻣﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ. ﻧﻘﺶ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺍﻳﻨﺴﺖ ﮐﻪ ﺭﻫﻨﻤﻮﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺑﮑﺎﺭﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺑـﺮﺍﻱ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻣﻌﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﭘﻴﺸ ﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﺩﻫﺪ. ﺗﻤﺮﮐﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺭﻭﻱ ﮐﺸﻒ ﺷﺒﺎﻫﺘﻬﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺑﻴﻦ ﭘﺎﻧﺰﺩﻩ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺱ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑـﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮐﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﮐﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﺷﺎﻧﺰﺩﻩ ﭘﺎﺭﺍﻣﺘﺮ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﺭﻭﺷ ﻬﺎ ﻣﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ. ﻛﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﻛﻠﻴﺪﻱ ﻣﻌﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﻧﺮﻡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ، ﺭﻭﺷ ﻬﺎﻱ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ، ﮐﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﻧﺮﻡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ. Architectures and Software Architecture Evaluation Methods Eslam Nazemi, Ali Izadi, Sanaz Heidari, Iman Ghezelbash, Peyman Emadi Abstract In the recent four, the complexity of the software has increased and there for the demand and request for powerful software all increasing they by they too. Mean will it seem, that the old methods and softwares doesn't respond the modern days demands and needs, and the need to develop and utilize new approaches that can over come these complications in the shortest time is felt. On the other hand it is not possible to leave behind the current software and stop using them witch servicing the clients so for, are so we should develop and create new systems and softwares that are able operate along the old systems and softwares. Recently researches about software architectures significant is becoming one off the most subject in the software engineering domain and the analysis of software architecture is also one of the main topics of discussion these days. The purpose of the architecture evaluation of a software system is to analyze the architecture to identify potential risks and to verify that the quality requirements have been addressed in the design. The role of the discussion is to offer guidelines related to the use of the most suitable method for an architecture assessment process. We will concentrate on discovering similarities and differences between these fifteen available methods. We compare SA evaluation methods using a comparison framework with sixteen elements. Keywords Software architecture, evaluation method, software quality. * ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩﻳﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻤﯽ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺷﻬﻴﺪ ﺑﻬﺸﺘﻲ ¥ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮﻳ ﺎﻥ ﮐﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﺭﺷﺪ ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻲ ﮐﺎﻣﭙﻴﻮﺗﺮ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ ﻗﺰﻭﻳﻦ 2159