Original Research
Claustrophobia and Premature Termination of
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Examinations
Iris Eshed, MD, Christian E. Althoff, MD, Bernd Hamm, MD, and
Kay-Geert A. Hermann, MD
*
Purpose: To evaluate the incidence of MRI-related claus-
trophobia and prematurely terminated MRI (ptMRI) exam-
inations due to claustrophobia in a large-scale cohort
study.
Materials and Methods: The hospital’s computerized radi-
ology information system (RIS) was retrospectively analyzed
for all 1.5-Tesla MRI examinations and reports during the
year 2004. Data collected included demographic informa-
tion, body part examined, known claustrophobia, and
whether the examination was prematurely terminated. All
information available on the MRI examinations and the
patient-based data (i.e., excluding any additional examina-
tions per patient) were analyzed.
Results: A total of 5798 MRI reports of 4821 patients were
evaluated. A total of 95 patients (1.97%) suffered from
claustrophobia and 59 (1.22%) prematurely terminated the
examination due to claustrophobia. The incidence of ptMRI
was higher in women than men (no statistical significance).
The majority of patients with ptMRI were between 20 and
80 years old. Patients undergoing head MRI showed the
highest incidence of ptMRI and those undergoing extrem-
ity, breast, or pelvic MRI had the lowest. Prone compared to
supine positioning results in the lowest ptMRI incidence (P
0.05).
Conclusion: Claustrophobic reactions cause a relatively
low incidence of ptMRI and are influenced by sex, body part
examined, and positioning within the MR scanner. Seda-
tion and prone positioning might help overcome these re-
actions.
Key Words: MRI; claustrophobia; safety; anxiety; safety
management; anxiolysis
J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2007;26:401– 404.
© 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
SINCE ITS INTRODUCTION in the 1980s, MRI has be-
come a popular diagnostic procedure. MRI evaluation
usually involves the patient being inserted head-first
into a relatively narrow tunnel and remaining motion-
less for up to and beyond one hour. Anxiety-related
reactions during MRI have been extensively reported
and researched, with a reported incidence of up to 37%
(1– 4). Claustrophobia is an anxiety disorder that in-
volves the fear of enclosed or confined spaces (5). The
reported incidence of premature termination, or failure
of the MRI examination due to claustrophobic reactions
ranges between 0.5% and 14.5%. The available data
has mostly been obtained with relatively old MRI scan-
ners and in small study cohorts (1,2,6 –9).
The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the
incidence of MRI-related claustrophobia and prema-
turely-terminated MRI examinations in a large-scale
cohort study of patients undergoing 1.5-Tesla MRI.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Our university-based department of radiology uses a
computerized radiology information system (RIS). For
every MRI examination performed, the patient and ex-
amination data are manually stored in the data base.
Additional information (i.e., if a patient misses the MRI
appointment, prematurely terminates the examination,
etc.) is also coded into the RIS.
An extensive computerized search of all MRI exami-
nations and reports performed during the year 2004
was carried out. For each examination, data collected
included demographic information of the patient (age,
sex), body part examined, whether contrast medium or
premedication was administered, known claustropho-
bia, and whether the examination was prematurely ter-
minated. Only routine MRI examinations were in-
cluded, while all study-based MRI examinations were
excluded. Then, a manual search of all written MRI
reports was performed to verify the computerized data
and the information about the reason for premature
termination and for premedication indications was
added. Terminated MRI examinations for reasons other
than known claustrophobia (N = 97) as well as reports
with incomplete or unclear data (N = 14) were excluded
(see summary in Table 1). Children under the age of five
years (N = 30) were also excluded.
Claustrophobia-related termination of the MRI exam-
ination was defined as severe anxiety (5) upon being
positioned in the MRI tunnel with the patient request-
ing to be taken out while the attending radiologist could
Department of Radiology, Charite ´ Medical School, Berlin, Germany.
*Address reprint requests to: K-G.A. Hermann, MD, Department of
Radiology, Charite ´ Medical School, Campus Mitte, Charite ´platz 1,
10117 Berlin, Germany. E-mail: kgh@charite.de
Received August 2, 2006; Accepted February 22, 2007.
DOI 10.1002/jmri.21012
Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com).
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING 26:401– 404 (2007)
© 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc. 401