2nd proofs  María Riera, Joaquín Romero & Ben Parrell Prator, Cliford H. Jr. & Betty Wallace Robinett. 1985. Manual of American English Pronunciation. (4th ed.). Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace. Riera, María & Joaquín Romero. 2006. “V+/l/ and V+/r/ Sequences in American English: A preliminary descriptive acoustic study”. Actas del XXIX Congreso Internacional de la Aso- ciación Española de Estudios Anglo-Norteamericanos/Proceedings of the 29th AEDEAN International Conference ed. by Alejandro Alcaraz Sintes, Concepción Soto Palomo & María de la Cinta Zunino Garrido. 529–536. Jaén, Spain: Universidad de Jaén Servicio de Publicaciones. ——— 2007. “Schwa in American English V+/l/ Sequences: Speaking rate efects”. Actes des/ Proceedings of JEL’2007: Schwa(s) – 5 èmes Journées d’Études Linguistiques de Nantes. 131–136. Nantes, France: Université de Nantes. Roach, Peter, James Hartman & Jane Setter, eds. 2006. Cambridge English Pronouncing Dictionary. (17th ed. ). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Rogers, Henry. 2000. Te Sounds of Language: An Introduction to Phonetics. Harlow, Essex, England: Pearson Education. Schmeiser, Benjamin. 2009. “Prosodic and Segmental Efects on Vowel Intrusion Duration in Spanish /ɾ C/ Clusters”. Tis volume. Trask, R.L. 1996. A Dictionary of Phonetics and Phonology. London: Routledge. Van Riper, Charles G. & Dorothy E. Smith. 1992. An Introduction to General American Phonetics. (3rd ed.). Prospect Heights, IL. Waveland Press. Warner, Natasha, Allard Jongman, Ann Cutler & Doris Mücke. 2001. “Te Phonological Status of Dutch Epenthetic Schwa”. Phonology 18:3. 387–420. Wells, J.C. 2000. Longman Pronunciation Dictionary. (2nd ed.). Harlow, Essex, England: Longman-Pearson Education. Perception of word stress in Castilian Spanish Te efects of sentence intonation and vowel type* Marta Ortega-Llebaria 1 & Pilar Prieto 2 1 University of Texas at Austin/ 2 ICREA & Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona We provide evidence for the perception of the stress contrast in unaccented contexts in Spanish. Twenty participants were asked to identify oxytone words which varied orthogonally in two bi-dimensional paroxytone-oxytone continua: one of duration and spectral tilt, and the other of duration and overall intensity. Results indicate that duration and overall intensity were cues to stress, while spectral tilt was not. Moreover, stress detection depended on vowel type: the stress contrast was perceived more consistently in [a] than in [i]. Tus, in spite of lacking vowel reduction, stress in Spanish has its own phonetic material in the absence of pitch accents. However, we cannot speak of cues to stress in general since they depend on the characteristics of the vowel. 1. Introduction Te goal of this article is to investigate which acoustic cues and cue-interactions Spanish speakers use to perceive primary stress in unaccented contexts. Previous studies in Spanish have examined cues to stress in accented contexts, where there is co-variation between stress and accent (Enríquez et al. 1989; Llisterri et al. 2004 and Solé 1985, among others). For example, Llisterri et al. (2004) examined the perception of stress in one word declarative utterances, which are consistently produced with a pitch accent on the stressed syllable and lengthening on the last syllable. Consequently, they found that pitch was the main cue to stress, followed frst by duration, and then by intensity. More specifcally, duration and intensity cues were not sufcient to perceive stress unless they were processed together with a pitch accent. However, as Beckman and Edwards (1994:13) explained, this is a source of misunderstanding: in short utterances, pitch excursions are likely to be interpreted in terms of the sequence at a nuclear accent, as in Fry’s 1955 experiment showing the salience *Many thanks to Eva Estebas and Ana Estrella for their help with data collection. Tis research was funded by a grant from the Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia, Spain.