Spatial Managerial ption Modeling for Determining O s for Structuring Productivity in KPH Bogor Ricca Rohani Hutauruk , Nining Puspaningsih , Muhammad Buce Saleh 1, 2* 3 3 1 o Graduate School f Bogor Agricultural University, Dramaga Main Road, Campus IPB Dramaga, Bogor, Indonesia 16680 2 Environment and Forestry Education and Training Bogor Agency, The Ministry of Environment and Forestry, Jl. Prada Samlawi Rumpin, Bogor, Indonesia Department of Forest Management, Faculty of Forestry, Bogor Agricultural University, Academic Ring Road, 3 Campus IPB Dramaga, PO Box 168, Bogor, Indonesia 16680 Received Agustus 23, 2016/Accepted October 20, 2016 Abstract In the past few years has experienced many problems, , forest management unit (KPH) Bogor technical, environment and social, . al affecting the company's finances This conditionrequires new breakthroughs in the form of managerial options in managing the forests of KPH Bogor. At present, has formulated KPH Bogor 12 managerial option . . patial s The purpose of this study is to build a spatial model in selecting managerial options at site level The s model score unit s were built based on the of each land which was obtained from expert judgment using an intensity scale while was obtained using a pairwise comparison, resulting in the following equation t = , weight : otal score 0.14 ( + x + ( 0.06x 0.11 0.09x + 0.08x + 0.10yx + 0.31x + 0.25x ) + 0.72 0.08y + 0.22y + 0.46y + 0.13y + 0.12y ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 +0.14 0.45z + 0.05z + 0.44z + 0.06z . 1 2 3 4 ( ) The resulting total score was then divided into 5 classes using the equal interva method The results for each of the managerial options were then aggregated using GIS to create KPH l . Bogor's management pattern. In areas where there was an overlap due to the similarity in s, a decision support option system using neighboring similarity spatial analysis was used. This step allowed the s to be built with patial model many ic s This s could map types of s at biophysical, social, and econom variable . patial model 12 managerial option site level in the in production structuring KPH Bogor. Keywords: forest management unit, multi-criteria analysis, geographic information system, Perhutani *Correspondence author, email: ricca_brit@yahoo.com, ph.: +62-81317008648 Introduction Forest preservation is responsibility, including all kesatuan pengelolaan hutan ( ) . KPH is a forest KPH Bogor management unit part of Perhutani (Indonesian state-owned enterprises in the field of forestry). s o As a tate wned enterprise in forestry, KPH Bogor is demanded to preserve the sustainability of forests for the sustainability of the business. However, in reality, sustainability is far from the reach of KPH Bogor. At the moment, KPH Bogor is facing many problems : (Perhutani 2015) 1 Nearly 50% of KPH Bogor has tenurial problems (19,836.15 ha out of the 47,991.04 ha under KPH Bogor's control . ) 2 The high population in KPH Bogor with their many needs are the cause for almost all KPH Bogor land to be cultivated by people. 3 Environmental degradation within KPH Bogor's area has caused it to be declared as a national strategic area which needs integrated spatial planning, spatial utilization, and regulation of spatial utilization. 4 The degradation of the forest class structure causing it to not be a normal forest which is one criterion for sustainable forest management as sustainable yield of stands will be achieved if growth and harvesting takes place in a balanced manner. Sustainable yield is used as a basic principle in harvesting and rely heavily on the results of regulatory system that is used. To achieve sustainability, forest product regulatory system should set the intensity of harvesting, harvesting time intervals, and the magnitude and extent of harvesting (Seydack 1995). The condition faced by KPH Bogor requires breakthroughs in the form of managerial options in KPH Bogor's forest management. The selection of these managerial options undoubtedly require the decisions most appropriate with KPH Bogor. Decision-making in forest management planning is a complex issue because the decisions affect many parties (Varma . 2000 ; Davis et al et al. 2001; Mendoza & Martin 2006; Balteiro & Romero 2008; Ananda & Herath 2009). Therefore, to avoid deterioration in management decisions, the forest management planning JMHT Vol. 22, (3): 169-179, December 2016 EISSN: 2089-2063 DOI: 10.7226/jtfm.22.3.169 Scientific Article ISSN: 2087-0469