water
Article
Water ‘Apartheid’ and the Significance of Human Rights
Principles of Affirmative Action in South Africa
Ademola Oluborode Jegede
1,
* and Pumzile Shikwambane
2
Citation: Jegede, A.O.;
Shikwambane, P. Water ‘Apartheid’
and the Significance of Human Rights
Principles of Affirmative Action in
South Africa. Water 2021, 13, 1104.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w13081104
Academic Editor: Bruce M. Wilson
Received: 20 January 2021
Accepted: 23 February 2021
Published: 16 April 2021
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral
with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional affil-
iations.
Copyright: © 2021 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).
1
School of Law Staff, University of Venda, Thohoyandou 0950, South Africa
2
Limpopo Department of Agricultural and Rural Development, Polokwane 0727, South Africa;
shikwambanep93@gmail.com
* Correspondence: ademola.jegede@univen.ac.za; Tel.: +27-636-587-791
Abstract: Water is an essential necessity for human beings; however, South Africa has a long
history of inequalities dating back to apartheid politics and legislation which denied access to
water to disadvantaged black populations mostly residing in rural areas. Although apartheid has
officially ended, whether the lack of access to water by such populations who still cannot afford
it exists and aligns with international human rights principles of equality and non-discrimination
merits an examination. To redress the injustices of the apartheid regime, the right to have access
to sufficient water is entrenched in section 27(1)(b) of the 1996 South African Constitution. In
addition to embracing equality and non-discrimination, the Constitution informs other instruments
and measures such as free basic water policy and pre-paid meters meant to ensure access to water.
However, the plight of these populations persists in post-apartheid South Africa, but it is rarely a
subject of academic scrutiny how the notion of affirmative action as grounded in the principles of
equality and non-discrimination under human rights law can be deployed as a response. Using
a doctrinal research approach, this article argues that the continuing struggle of disadvantaged
communities with access to water does not only constitute water apartheid, it negates the human
rights principles of equality and non-discrimination. The principle of affirmative action is useful in
responding to inadequate access to sufficient water by disadvantaged populations in post-apartheid
South Africa.
Keywords: affirmative action; apartheid; disadvantaged populations; equality; human rights;
non-discrimination; politics; water; South Africa
1. Introduction
Water is essential for human beings irrespective of race, disability and social status.
South Africa has a long history of enormous differences and inequalities regarding service
delivery including access to water. Under the apartheid regime, a high level of inequality
was a trend in access to water, a development that favoured the minority white populations
and unfairly disadvantaged the black rural communities. Although since 1994 when
apartheid officially ended, there has been a rework of the South African water law and
policy [1], agitations for equality in water access are still rampant and still highly debated
in political arena in post-apartheid South Africa [2]. Literature has engaged the political
dimension to the access of disadvantaged communities to water and measures meant to
allow their access to water in South Africa [3,4]. There is scholarship on the vision and
weaknesses of post 1994 water policies and measures including the implementation of the
free basic water policy [5] and prepaid water meters [1]. Despite these measures, access
to water continues to raise the issues around equality and non-discrimination involving
populations disadvantaged by past unfair practices and laws in South Africa. How current
experiences reflect a similar consequence as did the unfair discriminatory practices of the
apartheid regime merits a scrutiny. In addition, it is a rare discussion in literature regarding
the way in which the principles of equality and non-discrimination may be deployed in
Water 2021, 13, 1104. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13081104 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/water