Application of backwashing with demineralized water for UF fouling control in UF-RO desalination Sheng Li, S. G. J. Heijman and J. C. van Dijk ABSTRACT The effectiveness of demineralized water backwash on ultraltration (UF) fouling control of seawater is investigated in this study. Fouling experiments for two different backwashes (UF permeate and demineralized water) were conducted at three uxes: 120, 180 and 240 L/(h m 2 ) to compare their fouling control efciency on UF membranes. Results show that backwashing with demineralized water improved the fouling control of UF membranes. When the UF membranes were backwashed with demineralized water, probably because more foulants were ushed away from the UF membrane than UF permeate backwashes, the increase in trans membrane pressure (TMP) for backwashing with demineralized water was less than that with UF permeate. Furthermore, the uxes of experiments also played a role on the fouling control. When the ux was 120 L/(h m 2 ), the difference between two different backwashes was small. However, at the ux of 240 L/(h m 2 ), the TMP for backwashing with UF permeate increased faster than that with demineralized water, although the TMP for backwashing with demineralized water increased as well. Sheng Li (corresponding author) S. G. J. Heijman J. C. van Dijk Delft University of Technology, P.O. Box 5048, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands E-mail: s.li@tudelft.nl Key words | ultraltration, backwash, demineralized water, desalination INTRODUCTION Ultraltration as an pretreatment of desalination Ultraltration (UF) has been applied for water treatments for two decades due to its good removal on the particles and microorganisms (Laine et al. ). With the develop- ment of membrane technology, the cost of low pressure membranes (microltration and UF) decreases to an accep- table level for application. That is the reason why the use of low pressure membranes for water purication has substan- tially grown in the past decades. Not only in the drinking water treatment, but also in the desalination eld, UF as a pretreatment for the reverse osmosis (RO) currently appeared. Several studies have investigated using hollow ber UF membranes as a pretreatment for desalination with reverse osmosis (SWRO). Ahmad & Aleem () showed that comparing to conventional pretreatments, the inside-out hollow ber UF process is an easy-to-use and robust alternative. Hoof et al.() carried out a pilot test in Addur using X-Flow hollow ber UF membranes as a pre- treatment for six months, and results showed that the UF permeate had a stable SDI as low as 1.5. Merrilee & James () successfully supplied a UFSWRO system to the government of the United Arab Emirates that treats about 11.4 million litres (3 million gallons) of seawater a day with UF to supply 3.8 million litres (1 million gallons) to the SWRO system. Application of the DEMIFLUSH concept Same as the UF in drinking water treatment, the main chal- lenge of UF in the seawater treatment is still fouling. Since all industrial plants produce water at a constant ux, the trans membrane pressure (TMP) has to be increased to over- come the increased resistance caused by fouling. In order to control fouling, normally the membrane is hydraulically backwashed to recover the membrane permeability. The part of TMP reduced after a hydraulic backwash is related 364 © IWA Publishing 2011 Water Science & Technology: Water Supply | 11.3 | 2011 doi: 10.2166/ws.2011.033 Downloaded from https://iwaponline.com/ws/article-pdf/11/3/364/416546/364.pdf by guest on 30 May 2020