agronomy
Article
Dissection of the Contributing Factors to the Variable Response
of Crop Yield to Surface Applied Lime in Australia
Yvette M. Oliver
1,
* , Chris Gazey
2
, James Fisher
3
and Michael Robertson
1
Citation: Oliver, Y.M.; Gazey, C.;
Fisher, J.; Robertson, M. Dissection of
the Contributing Factors to the
Variable Response of Crop Yield to
Surface Applied Lime in Australia.
Agronomy 2021, 11, 829. https://
doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11050829
Academic Editor: Carlos
García-Delgado
Received: 31 March 2021
Accepted: 20 April 2021
Published: 23 April 2021
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral
with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional affil-
iations.
Copyright: © 2021 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).
1
Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Underwood Avenue,
Floreat, WA 6014, Australia; Michael.Robertson@csiro.au
2
Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (DPIRD),
East Perth, WA 6004, Australia; chris.gazey@dpird.wa.gov.au
3
Désiree Futures, York, WA 6302, Australia; james@desireefutures.net.au
* Correspondence: yvette.oliver@csiro.au
Abstract: Modern agricultural farming systems acidify the soil profile due to application of fertilisers
with acidifying properties. In most parts of Australia, lime has been used to improve agricultural
soil conditions and restore its productive potential. The observed response of crop yield to applied
lime often varies with soil type, acidity profile and seasonal conditions, so it is difficult to specify
the expected yield response in a given situation. We conducted a meta-analysis of 86 agricultural
field trials from Western Australia (WA), New South Wales (NSW) and Victoria (VIC) where various
rates of lime had been applied to the soil surface and crop yield (wheat, barley, canola, lupin or field
pea) measured for a number of years after the initial application. Information from the meta-analysis
was then paired with output from a crop simulation model, where the water-limited yield potential
was estimated for both a neutral and acidified soil profile. The average increase in yield to applied
lime across all locations and crops was 12%, but the response ranged from 0 to 185%. A trend was
observed, where sites with topsoil pH (CaCl
2
) < 5 and subsoil pH < 4.5 had the greater benefit to
liming. Soil type had little effect on the percentage yield increase. Overall, responses to applied lime
were most likely when the yield of the trial site was at 50% of water-limited yield potential (or less),
the quantity of lime applied was greater than 2.5 t ha
-1
and the time since lime had been applied
was greater than three years (with the maximum response occurring from four and sometimes up to
eight years after liming). Therefore, soil pH measurements, combined with an assessment of actual
yield relative to potential yield, provide the best guide to the response to surface applied lime and
this response is likely to take more than four years to be realised.
Keywords: soil acidity; liming; crop yield; soil constraints
1. Introduction
The soil in the wheat belt of Western Australia (WA), New South Wales (NSW) and
Victoria (VIC) has many attributes that limit crop production. Most soil is derived from
ancient granitic rocks and sediments. Weathering and leaching of these rocks have resulted
in predominately sandy textured soil with acidic pH, low nutrient levels and low buffering
capacity. The agricultural system has magnified these problems. Processes such as the
removal of grain, use of legume crops and pastures, application of fertiliser with acidifying
properties, and leaching processes have increased the rate of soil acidification, particularly
under more intensive crop production [1,2].
Soil acidification in the agricultural and cropping areas affects an estimated 14.25 million
hectares (~80%) in WA [3,4], 16–20 million hectares (~50%) in NSW [5] and 3 million
hectares (23%) in VIC [6]. The combined impact of surface and subsurface acidity has been
estimated to be responsible for an annual loss of income to the grains and agricultural
industry of $500–1600 million in WA [7], $378 million in NSW [8] and $470 million in
VIC [8].
Agronomy 2021, 11, 829. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11050829 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/agronomy