Impact Factor: ISRA (India) = 3.117 ISI (Dubai, UAE) = 0.829 GIF (Australia) = 0.564 JIF = 1.500 SIS (USA) = 0.912 РИНЦ (Russia) = 0.156 ESJI (KZ) = 4.102 SJIF (Morocco) = 5.667 ICV (Poland) = 6.630 PIF (India) = 1.940 IBI (India) = 4.260 Philadelphia, USA 124 QR – Issue QR – Article SOI: 1.1/TAS DOI: 10.15863/TAS International Scientific Journal Theoretical & Applied Science p-ISSN: 2308-4944 (print) e-ISSN: 2409-0085 (online) Year: 2018 Issue: 11 Volume: 67 Published: 22.11.2018 http://T-Science.org Oksana Priemets Candidate of Science (Architecture), Lecturer of International Education Corporation, Kazakhstan oksana.priemets@mail.ru Konstantin Samoilov Doctor of Science (Architecture) Lecturer of International Education Corporation, Kazakhstan samconiv@mail.ru SECTION 8.Architecture and construction. A DETERMINATION OF THE QUANTITY OF ORNAMENTAL COMPOSITION ELEMENTS DEPENDING ON THE PREASSIGNED PROPORTION Abstract: Harmonization of the dimension proportions of the elements of architectural composition in most cases of a creative approach to architectural design is one of the basic tasks. For many thousands years of architecture development, the authors of the projects have tried a large number methods of proportioning elements. The mathematical formalization method of empirical data considered in the article allows to determinenumber of elements in the composition, the accentuation of which allows solving the question of its general harmonization. A particular case of this method is optimal for determining the number of ornamental compositions elements. Key words: ornament, architectural composition, proportions of elements, harmonization of sizes. Language: English Citation: Priemets, O., & Samoilov, K. (2018). A determination of the quantity of ornamental composition elements depending on the preassigned proportion. ISJ Theoretical & Applied Science, 11 (67), 124-129. Soi: http://s-o-i.org/1.1/TAS-11-67-20 Doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.15863/TAS.2018.11.67.20 Introduction Modern architecture demonstrates many examples of the active use of thematically different ornaments, not only as separate elements or inserts, but also in the sense-forming solutions of surfaces of different configurations that form an array of very interesting material for analysis (B.C.Brolin, 2000; A.U.Mal’chik, 2010; J.H.Gleiter, 2012; S.G.Khmelnitsky, 2013; D.D.Omuraliev, O.V.Wolitschenko, 2013; O.N.Priemetz, K.I.Samoilov, 2013 and other). Among the typical examples of this century, such buildings as: The Restaurant «Zhety Kazyna», Almaty, Kazakhstan, 2002(Arch. S.Usenko, K.Samoilov – «Autotechnika – Architectural workshop»); The Acqualina Sunny Isles Condos., Sunny Isles, Florida, USA, 2006 (Arch. R.M.Swedroe – «Robert M.Swedroe Architects & Planners»); The dwelling house – reconstruction, Almaty, Kazakhstan, 2007 (Arch. «Etnomura»); The «Cardinal Group» headquarters – «The Orange Cube», Lyon, France, 2011(Arch. D.Jakob and B.MacFarlane – «Jakob+MacFarlane Architects»); The Schoolchild Creativity Palace, Astana, Kazakhstan, 2012 (Arch. N.Yavein – «Studio 44 Architects», «Basis-А»); Тhe Republic of Kazakhstan National Museum, Astana, Kazakhstan, 2014 (Arch. V.Laptev – «VL», «Bazis-A»); The «Novotel-Almaty» Hotel, Almaty, Kazakhstan, 2016 (Arch. «AHR»); The National Museum of African American History and Culture, Washington D.C., USA, 2016 (Arch. P.Freelon); The Mall, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2016 (Arch. X.Vilalta – «Vilalta Arquitectura»); The «Astana Ballet» Theatre and the «Kazakhstan National Academy of choreography» Education Center, Astana, Kazakhstan, 2016 (Arch. «Studio 44 Architects», «Bazis-A»); The “AmurE” Triumph Palace, Almaty, Kazakhstan, 2016 (Arch. K.Samoilov – “Europolis”) and others.