Citation: Assefa, S.; Lee, H.-Y.; Shiue,
F.-J. Sustainability Performance of
Green Building Rating Systems
(GBRSs) in an Integration Model.
Buildings 2022, 12, 208. https://
doi.org/10.3390/buildings12020208
Academic Editor: Krishanu Roy
Received: 9 January 2022
Accepted: 4 February 2022
Published: 11 February 2022
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral
with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional affil-
iations.
Copyright: © 2022 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).
buildings
Article
Sustainability Performance of Green Building Rating Systems
(GBRSs) in an Integration Model
Sintayehu Assefa
1
, Hsin-Yun Lee
1,
* and Fang-Jye Shiue
2
1
Department of Civil and Construction Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology,
Taipei 106, Taiwan; d10805806@mail.ntust.edu.tw
2
Graduate Institute of Architecture & Sustainable Planning, National Ilan University, Yi-Lan 260007, Taiwan;
fajy@ms24.hinet.net
* Correspondence: hsinyun0520@mail.ntust.edu.tw; Tel.: +886-2-27376567
Abstract: In most countries, more than one green building rating system (GBRS) is available on the
market. Because of their different approaches, it is difficult to confirm which system can respond
to sustainability requirements better. A building considered to be “green” by one Green Building
Council (GBC) may fail to satisfy the requirements set by another council. The aim of this study
is to evaluate the sustainability performance of GBRSs and establish an integrated model of multi-
certification for optimal sustainability. A direct content analysis method was utilized to evaluate
GBRSs’ qualitative performance using the ISO sustainable building standards. In this study, seven
purposively selected multi-certified buildings were evaluated, and an integrated model was proposed
as a better mechanism for the multi-certification process. The proposed integrated model contributes
to the achievement of sustainability indicators. The model was implemented on case study buildings,
and the proposed combination shows better sustainability performance than existing practice. The
developed model helps practitioners in their selection of GBRSs in the multi-certification process.
In addition, the performance evaluation of GBRSs will support the future update of GBRSs. The
qualitative performance evaluation was performed considering mandatory requirements and prereq-
uisite and credit requirements of selected rating systems, making the work a stronger approach than
previous studies.
Keywords: green building rating systems; sustainable building; ISO sustainability indicators; multi-
certification; integration model
1. Introduction
Sustainable building principles, a major part of sustainable construction, are mainly
applied using green building rating systems (GBRSs). Acceptance of the systems has been
increasing since their emergence [1–3]. Nowadays, several rating systems, from those in
the local context to fully flexible international systems, such as the Sustainable Building
Tool (SBTool) [4,5], are available on the market. However, the heterogeneity [6] of the GBRS
approach and the contradictory results of the system performance [7,8] along with the
benefits for users [9–11] have been believed to affect the wide acceptance of the approach,
especially in developing nations.
One of the key challenges in the system is the difficulty in balancing the conflicting
requirements among the main dimensions (i.e., environmental, social, and economic) [12].
Because of this challenge, the managers of building design and construction need more
support to achieve the complete sustainability [13]. Doan, et al. [14] evaluated Lead-
ership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), Building Research Establishment
Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM), Comprehensive Assessment System for
Built Environment Efficiency (CASBEE), and Green Star New Zealand (Green Star NZ)
according to the environmental, social, economic, and institutional “sustainability pillars”
Buildings 2022, 12, 208. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12020208 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/buildings