Article
Development of an Optical System for Non-Contact Type
Measurement of Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability
Jyoti Gondane * and Meena S. Panse
Citation: Gondane, J.; Panse, M.S.
Development of an Optical System
for Non-Contact Type Measurement
of Heart Rate and Heart Rate
Variability. Appl. Syst. Innov. 2021, 4,
48. https://doi.org/10.3390/
asi4030048
Academic Editor: Christos Douligeris
Received: 16 June 2021
Accepted: 23 July 2021
Published: 28 July 2021
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral
with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional affil-
iations.
Copyright: © 2021 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).
Department of Electrical Engineering, Veermata Jeejabai Technological Institute (VJTI), Mumbai 400019, India;
mspanse@el.vjti.ac.in
* Correspondence: jagondane@el.vjti.ac.in
Abstract: Self-mixing optical coherent detection is a non-contact measurement technique which
provides accurate information about the vibration frequency of any test subject. In this research,
novel designs of optical homodyne and heterodyne detection techniques are explained. Homodyne
and heterodyne setups are used for measuring the frequency of the modulated optical signal. This
technique works on the principle of the optical interferometer, which provides a coherent detection
of two self-mixing beams. In the optical homodyne technique, one of the two beams receives direct
modulation from the vibration frequency of the test subject. In the optical heterodyne detection
technique, one of the two optical beams is subjected to modulation by an acousto-optics modulator
before becoming further modulated by the vibration frequency of the test subject. These two optical
signals form an interference pattern that contains the information of the vibration frequency. The
measurement of cardiovascular signals, such as heart rate and heart rate variability, are performed
with both homodyne and heterodyne techniques. The optical coherent detection technique provides
a high accuracy for the measurement of heart period and heart rate variability. The vibrocardiogram
output obtained from both techniques are compared for different heart rate values. Results obtained
from both optical homodyne and heterodyne detection techniques are compared and found to be
within 1% of deviation value. The results obtained from both the optical techniques have a deviation
of less than 1 beat per minute from their corresponding ECG values.
Keywords: homodyne detection; heterodyne detection; Mach–Zehnder interferometer; acousto-
optics modulator; vibrocardiogram; heart period; heart rate; heart rate variability
1. Introduction
The maximum critical cases across the world are related to chronic cardiorespiratory
conditions. Demographic changes are expected to cause home monitoring approaches
to take a leading role in the future treatment of such patients [1,2]. Remote monitoring
technologies have gained a significant importance in the COVID-19 era. During the
pandemic, the use of non-contact type techniques for the measurement of bio-parameters
have increased rapidly. Although fixed-on-body electrodes are reliable and give good
signal quality, there are several disadvantages of this method. The major demerit of
this technique is the direct fixing of electrodes on skin, as it leads to discomfort among
patients. Direct measurement on skin becomes very critical, especially in the case of infants
and people with burn injuries. Therefore, the interpretation of cardiovascular signals
through unobtrusive means has gained importance in recent years. A vast amount of
research is available for the measurement of cardiovascular parameters, but most of the
research is related to contact type measurement. There is much less clinical awareness of
non-contact type optical measurement of cardiovascular parameters. There are several
reasons contributing to this fact, such as the absence of a specific therapy for prognosis
improvement. Furthermore, there is a lack of standardized methodology for parameter
assessment due to the variability of factors, such as gender, age, medical history for illness,
and drug interferences [3]. The common intention behind this development is to enable the
Appl. Syst. Innov. 2021, 4, 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi4030048 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/asi