Jour of Adv Research in Dynamical & Control Systems, Vol. 12, Issue-06, 2020 939 DOI: 10.5373/JARDCS/V12I6/S20201113 *Corresponding Author: Bernadus Gunawan Sudarsono ,Email: gunawanbernadus@ubk.ac.id Article History: Received: Mar 21, 2020, Accepted: June 22, 2020 Systematic Review of the Builder Method and Product of the Information System Strategic Planning at Higher Education Institutions in Indonesia Bernadus Gunawan Sudarsono 1 , Aedah Binti Abd Rahman 2 , Sri Poedji Lestari 3 , Alexius Ulan Bani 4 Universitas Bung Karno, Jakarta, Indonesia 1,3,4 , Asia e University, Selangor, Malaysia 2 Abstract-Research on the utilization of Information System Strategic Planning (ISSP) in Higher Educations in Indonesia is still being conducted. ISSP provides an important role in the successful use of information systems in Higher Education in the form of the realization of benefits. Therefore ISSP needs to be built properly by utilizing the appropriate ISSP builder methods, to produce ISSP products that can provide benefits realization. Current ISSP building methodologies commonly used are frameworks such as Business Systems Planning (BSP), Ward and Peppard (W&P), Zachman Enterprise Architecture (EA), Enterprise Architecture Planning (EAP), EA TOGAF (The Open Group Architecture Framework), Tozer, PPDIOO (Prepare, Plan, Design, Implementation, Operate, Optimize) and EUP (Enterprise Unified Process). Commonly produced ISSP products are Blueprint(BLPT), Application Portfolio(APPF), EA Model(EAMD), Strategic Planning (STPN), Master Plan(MTPN), and Road Map (RDMP). The results of research that discuss building methodologies and ISSP products are currently being conducted at Higher Education in Indonesia, but there is still little research that discusses the exploration of the accumulated use of the ISSP method, ISSP products, and mapping of ISSP methodologies to ISSP products. This exploration effort is useful in obtaining reality and phenomena related to ISSP product development methodologies and their mapping. The research aims to explore the method of ISSP builders and products and their mapping at Higher Educations in Indonesia in the period 2009 to 2019 by utilizing the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method. The results of this study provide synthesis and mapping related to the ISSP builder method and products in Indonesia. Keyword: Information System Strategic Planning, ISSP Builder Method, ISSP Products Introduction ISSP is part of the development of information systems that is a very important influence on the organization [1]. ISSP can be felt in terms of the realization of the benefits of the products it produces. Higher Education as an organization also utilizes the realization of ISSP benefits. The role of ISSP is very important for Higher Educations in Indonesia [2] because of the realization of perceived benefits. The realization of ISSP benefits is felt in terms of effectiveness, alignment, efficiency, capability, flexibility, competitive advantage, and performance improvement. ISSP needs to be built with a method that is in line with the Higher Education's business strategy to produce ISSP products that benefit realization. The method is in the form of stages of any activity [3] [4] and how it must be carried out by the enterprise, so that an information system or information technology can be developed as expected, for short, medium, and long term periods. The ISSP building method at Higher Educations in Indonesia varies and produces ISSP products that vary as well. Usually, the determination of the use of the builder's method and ISSP products is determined by the Higher Education based on its knowledge and best practices from other Higher Educations or vendors. There are quite a lot of variations in the ISSP building method used at Higher Education in Indonesia including BSP, Ward and Peppard, EA Zachman, EAP, TOGAF EA, Tozer, PPDIOO and EUP. The BSP method[5] provides strategic planning capabilities with the stages of defining business processes, defining business data, and defining information architecture. The Ward and Peppard [6] method are capable of developing strategic planning with the inclusion of inputs and outputs in it. Inputs in this method are internal business environment analysis, external business environment analysis, internal IS / IT (Information System / Information Technology) environmental analysis and external IS / IT environmental analysis. The output of this method is the IS business strategy, IT strategy, and IS / IT management strategy. The Zachman EA method[7] provides enterprise architecture development capabilities with a framework consisting of 6 rows and 6 columns. The EAP method[8] provides the ability to build an enterprise architecture that takes precedence with identifying information needs and then utilizing technology by mapping in the form of data architecture, application architecture, and technology architecture. The TOGAF method [9] provides enterprise architecture development capabilities with 8 core phases in development and maintenance. The Tozer method provides the ability to prepare IS / IT strategic plans with the stages of analyzing the factors that affect company performance, formulating strategies, and implementing proposed projects to be carried out. PPDIOO method[10] provides strategic planning capabilities with the stages of Prepare, Plan, Design, Implement, Operate, and Optimize. The