batteries
Article
Design Considerations for Fast Charging Lithium Ion Cells
for NMC/MCMB Electrode Pairs
William Yourey
1,2,
* , Yanbao Fu
2
, Ning Li
2
, Vincent Battaglia
2
and Wei Tong
2
Citation: Yourey, W.; Fu, Y.; Li, N.;
Battaglia, V.; Tong, W.Design
Considerations for Fast Charging
Lithium Ion Cells for NMC/MCMB
Electrode Pairs. Batteries 2021, 7, 4.
https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries70
10004
Received: 16 November 2020
Accepted: 30 December 2020
Published: 5 January 2021
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neu-
tral with regard to jurisdictional clai-
ms in published maps and institutio-
nal affiliations.
Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. Li-
censee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and con-
ditions of the Creative Commons At-
tribution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).
1
College of Engineering, Penn State University Hazleton Campus, Hazleton, PA 18202, USA
2
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Energy Storage and Distributed Resources Division,
Berkeley, CA 94720, USA; YanbaoFu@lbl.gov (Y.F.); NingLilbl@gmail.com (N.L.); VSBattaglia@lbl.gov (V.B.);
Weitong@lbl.gov (W.T.)
* Correspondence: wxy40@psu.edu
Abstract: Lithium ion cells that can be quickly charged are of critical importance for the continued
and accelerated penetration of electric vehicles (EV) into the consumer market. Considering this,
the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has set a cell recharge time goal of 10–15 min. The following
study provides an investigation into the effect of cell design, specifically negative to positive matching
ratio (1.2:1 vs. 1.7:1) on fast charging performance. By using specific charging procedures based
on negative electrode performance, as opposed to the industrial standard constant current constant
voltage procedures, we show that the cells with a higher N:P ratio can be charged to ~16% higher
capacity in the ten-minute time frame. Cells with a higher N:P ratio also show similar cycle life
performance to those with a conventional N:P ratio, despite the fact that these cells experience a
much higher irreversible capacity loss, leading to a lower reversible specific capacity.
Keywords: Li-ion battery; graphite anode; cell design; negative to positive matching ratio;
fast charging; reversible capacity ratio
1. Introduction
Lithium ion cells continue to be the energy storage medium of choice for many electric
vehicles (EV) currently in production [1]. For continued growth and further implemen-
tation of electric vehicles into the transportation market, it is crucial that battery “refuel”
times are reduced and become comparable to the time required to fill an internal com-
bustion engine (ICE) vehicle fuel tank [2]. Current pathways to “refuel” battery powered
vehicles are either quick cell replacement through exchange or swap stations [3], electrified
roads [4], or fast charging lithium ion cells [5–7]. Much effort is being spent throughout
industry and academia to develop fast charging batteries, and in regard to today’s currently
produced cells and commercially available negative electrode active materials, it is widely
accepted that the graphite negative electrode is a major factor, limiting fast charge capa-
bility and affecting both cell performance and safety [8–14]. When attempting to quickly
charge lithium ion cells containing a graphite negative electrode, polarization occurs and
the negative electrode reaches voltages below 0.00 V vs. Li/Li
+
, allowing lithium metal
plating to occur [15]. This occurs because most of the graphite capacity lies at or below
100 mV vs. Li/Li
+
[16], where a small polarization results in conditions favorable to lithium
metal plating. Cell designs are possible using higher voltage negative electrode materials
such as Li
4
Ti
5
O
12
(LTO), but there are drawbacks with these materials, namely high cost,
lower specific capacity, and lower output cell voltage compared to graphite based mate-
rials [17]. Based on these considerations, graphite is still the material of choice for most
lithium ion cells in production today [18]. These cells are typically charged using constant
current–constant voltage (CCCV) charge procedures, where cells are charged at relatively
low constant currents until the cell reaches the maximum design voltage, at which point the
cell is held at constant voltage until the current tapers to a specified cutoff amount. During
Batteries 2021, 7, 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries7010004 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/batteries