Public Policy and Administration Research www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-5731(Paper) ISSN 2225-0972(Online) Vol.10, No.6, 2020 47 The Implementation of Village Fund Policy in Poso Development in Sustainable Conducting Regency Moh. Rusli Syuaib 1 * Anhulaila M. Palampanga 2 Nasir Mangasing 3 Hasbullah 3 1.Postgraduate Students at Tadulako University, Indonesia 2.Faculty of Economy, Tadulako University, Indonesia 3.Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Tadulako University, Indonesia Abstract This study aims at finding out and analyzing how the implementation of the Village Fund Policy in Poso Regency 's conduct of sustainable development. The research method is purposeful that the use of nine persons involves six persons in the government division of the three persons, village government. The area used as the venue for the study is a three villages. The Research Instrument used interview , observation, and documentation. The data collected is analyzed using descriptive qualitative. The research theory employed is the Griddle Theory. Research finding is obtained that the real conditions in the field that village fund implementation in Poso Regency for three fund recipient villages in Poso Regency is more focused on village infrastructure programs rather than community empowerment programme. Human Resources are limited by lack of village fund management experience. BPD 's function as partner of village government is optimized. The conclusion is that the implementation of village fund policy in Poso regency was successful, based on the interests involved, the degree of change required, the position of the decision-making process and the types of benefits. Implementation of village fund policies in Poso regency was not successful objects, namely the operation and services system involved. The activity programme, focused on development. The activity program focuses more heavily on rural infrastructure development than the village community empowerment programme. There is a junior high school education involved in services, especially village officials and BPD, and most are inexperienced. Keywords: Policy of Implementation, Village Fund, Sustainable Development DOI: 10.7176/PPAR/10-6-07 Publication date:June 30th 2020 Introduction National development can not be separated from the hard work and dedication of village officials by any measure of success, and the positive and negative impact. In this case, there are still many problems facing rural communities that have not been fully resolved until now, such as poverty , unemployment and unequal income distribution, structural imbalances or backwardness in education. The village government is not sufficient provided the authority of the public trust, the lack of adequate sources of revenue, restricted authority in decisions about the standard of household material and the quantity of limitations of staff, the most obstacles that impede official results. Financing is an essential factor in supporting the implementation of the village and the regional autonomy(Nurhakim & Yudianto, 2018). Limitations of financial resources are minimal in the administration of the village government, generally capable of serving the interests of the best community (UN-HABITAT, 2015). Until now, the village administration has been more accurately called pseudo-government based on three reasons: first, it does not have the authority to collect taxes / taxes; second apparatus (village councils) is not civil servants; third, the apparatus (village councils) is not paid by the state to withdraw as a civil servant. Village Fund Policy clearly stipulated in Village Law No. 6 of 2014 gives the village the opportunity to stand up and build on its own to achieve the well-being and quality of life of rural communities. This can be seen from the mandate of the act in which villages in Indonesia get transfer funds directly from the state budget. Policy village aimed to improve the village as well as a form of reinforcement village autonomy (Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 Tentang Desa, 2014). With the expected funds rural village can be more independent and able to finance the activities in the village is self-managed. As for the use of funds village designation for the following areas: a) Field includes rural development is improving the lives of the villagers preferred to finance the implementation of programs and activities in the field of basic social services and the development of the construction procurement meiputi pemeliaraan basic facilities and infrastructure to meet the needs of an urban environment, energy transport and information and communication. b) Community empowerment include improving the rural economy and increasing capacity. Based on the Regulation of the Minister of Home Affairs No. 113 of 2014 About Finances village and decree Poso No. 7 of 2017 on Procedures for the distribution and the determination of the details of village funds, namely, in Chapter II, Article 2 states that the village finances are managed based on the principles of transparent, accountable, participatory and orderly and disciplined budget. Transparent is the principle of openness which enables the public to know about village finances and to have access to information as possible (Iznillah & Basri,