Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology 6(22): 4138"4144, 2013 DOI:10.19026/rjaset.6.3523 ISSN: 2040"7459; e"ISSN: 2040"7467 © 2013 Maxwell Scientific Publication Corp. Submitted: December 08, 2012 Accepted: January 11, 2013 Published: December 05, 2013   Muguthu Joseph Njuguna, School of Mechatronics Engineering, Department of Manufacturing and Automation, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, P.R. China This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). 4138             !"#$% & &’   ()  *  Muguthu Joseph Njuguna, Dong Gao and Zhaopeng Hao School of Mechatronics Engineering, Department of Manufacturing and Automation, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, P.R. China + The focus of this study is the turning of Al2124SiCp (45% wt) Metal Matrix Composite using PCD, CBN"coated and CBN"uncoated tools. The machinability of Al2124SiCp (45% wt) Metal Matrix Composite is evaluated by measurement of tool wear, surface finish and dimensional accuracy of the work"piece. Wear mechanisms and patterns of tools in turning of Al2124SiCp (45% wt) Metal Matrix Composite are discussed. The experimental setup involved turning Al2124SiCp (45% wt) 78.0 mm long and 31.8 mm diameter on a precision lathe at fixed feed rate, different depth of cut and cutting speed using PCD, CBN"coated and CBN"uncoated tools. The reinforcement of the matrix consists of SiC 5"8 µm in diameter. Experimental results reveal that abrasion and adhesion presented the most prevalent mode of wear among all the tools. Fracture was observed among CBN tools while chipping on PCD tools. Flank and crater wear were observed in all tools with flank wear more prevalent in both CBN"coated and CBN"uncoated. Wear among PCD tools was low as compared to CBN tools. Further analysis reveal that the outer layer of the CBN"coated tools wear off fast creating a good platform for adhesion of matrix material on to the tool. This further increases wear of the tool due to adhesive wear as the built"up edge breaks off from the tool. PCD tool presented better surface finish than CBN tools with CBN"coated performing better than CBN"uncoated. Due to high SiC content, discontinuous chips are formed which are also curled due to increase in temperature at cutting zone causing bimetallic effect on the chip. On dimensional accuracy it was observed that PCD tool produced lowest diameter error followed by CBN"uncoated and finally CBN"Coated. It is concluded that in machining Al2124SiCp (45% wt) Metal Matrix Composite PCD tools are the best followed by CBN"coated and lastly CBN"uncoated. ,$ Diameter error, surface roughness, wears mechanism )-.-) Metal Matrix Composites (MMCs) are endowed with superior properties but their full potential has not been realized yet over monolithic alloys. Key reason to this setback is their mach inability which still poses a significant setback (Persson, 2001; Muthukrishnan  ., 2008; Ciftci, 2009; Davim, 2003). The machining of MMCs is very difficult due to the highly abrasive and intermittent nature of the reinforcements. Presence of reinforcement phase in MMCs causes rapid abrasive tool wear (Ciftci, 2009; El"Gallab, 1998a; Muthukrishnan  ., 2007; Davim, 2012). MMC components are mostly produced using near net shape manufacturing methods and are subsequently finish machined to the final dimensions and surface finishes Muthukrishnan  . (2007). Cemented carbide tools, widely used in metal cutting wear rapidly while cutting particulate MMCs and produce very poor surface finish due to the presence of hard reinforced SiC particles (Ciftci, 2009; Muthukrishnan  ., 2007). Different classifications of tool wear mechanisms have been addressed in the literature. Basically, five wear mechanisms or any combinations of them are involved in tool wear. These are abrasion, adhesion, fatigue and dissolution/diffusion and tribochemical process. Attrition as a tool wear mechanism has also been reported. Holmberg and Mathews (1994) mention four main mechanisms of tool wear namely adhesive, abrasive, delamination and wear due to chemical instability, including diffusion, solution and electrochemical wear. Shaw (2005) mention eight mechanisms of tool wear as adhesive, abrasive, diffusion, fatigue, delamination, microchiping, gross fracture and plastic deformation. It is well accepted that the tool wear mechanisms in metal cutting involve more than one wear mechanism and it is difficult to predict the relative importance of any one of them. Predominance of wear mechanism depends on cutting conditions (Shaw, 2005). Extensive studies have been conducted in machining of particulate MMCs with regard to wear