Citation: Garzón-Juan, M.;
Nieto-Morote, A.; Ruz-Vila, F. Review
of NZEB Criteria: Design of Life
Containers in Operations Area.
Energies 2022, 15, 467. https://
doi.org/10.3390/en15020467
Academic Editors: Jose
Ignacio Muñoz-Hernandez,
Luis Baringo and
Francesco Minichiello
Received: 23 November 2021
Accepted: 7 January 2022
Published: 10 January 2022
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral
with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional affil-
iations.
Copyright: © 2022 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).
energies
Review
Review of NZEB Criteria: Design of Life Containers in
Operations Area
Mario Garzón-Juan
1
, Ana Nieto-Morote
1,
* and Francisco Ruz-Vila
2
1
Project Engineering Department, Polytechnic University of Cartagena, c/Dr. Fleming, s/n,
30202 Cartagena, Spain; mariogarzon@usal.es
2
Electrical Engineering Department, Polytechnic University of Cartagena, c/Dr. Fleming, s/n,
30202 Cartagena, Spain; paco.ruz@upct.es
* Correspondence: ana.nieto@upct.es
Abstract: The Spanish Ministry of Defense is currently attempting to reduce the amount of energy
that is consumed by its military bases and has therefore raised concerns about how to make their
facilities more energy efficient. To fulfill this objective, the Spanish army has developed various
studies and projects, as well as a technical prescription sheet that defines the thermal transmittance
values of the materials that are to be used to construct the different elements of the containers that
make up the temporary housing units at Spanish military camps. Both governments and private
entities have developed initiatives that are aimed at improving the energy efficiency of buildings,
which are classified into two groups: those aimed at the development of mandatory building codes
and those that are based on voluntary certification programs. The use of passive strategies is one
of the key actions that is being implemented to achieve the NZEB category, as its first requirement
is to be a “very low energy consumption building”. This paper compares the energy efficiency
requirements of the tents and containers that are used in military camps and the energy-efficient
design requirements that are demanded by the energy efficiency standards for buildings in the civil
sector. Through this comparison, we determine how energy efficient the current living spaces in
military camps are in order to define strategies that can be implemented to improve the design
requirements of these living spaces so to reduce the consumption and operation logistics and to
improve both operability and safety in military camp facilities.
Keywords: design of life containers; NZEB; operations area; military camps; efficient design
1. Introduction: Evolution of Energy Efficiency in the Military Bases
The development of the Paris Agreement at the United Nations Framework Conven-
tion on Climate Change has resulted in the increased energy efficiency of buildings and
the reduction of the GHG emissions of buildings, being one of the most important issues
related to energy policy. Despite significant improvements in recent years, the global share
of the final energy demand in buildings and the CO
2
emissions stood at 36% and 37%,
respectively, in 2020 [1,2].
NZEBs (net-zero energy buildings) are regarded as an integrated solution that can
be implemented to address problems that are related to energy-saving, environmental
protection, and CO
2
emission reduction in buildings and in the construction sector. NZEBs
mainly involve three kinds of energy efficient measures: passive design, service system,
and power generation from RES, as shown in Figure 1.
The use of passive strategies is one of the key actions that can be taken to achieve
the NZEB category, since being a “very low energy consumption building” is the first
requisite to achieve this status. Through these methods, a building’s energy consumption
can be reduced by evaluating different passive strategies during the design stage and by
implementing the most appropriate solutions according to the location, climate, cost, and
available materials [3].
Energies 2022, 15, 467. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020467 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/energies