Review
Cancer Dormancy: A Model of Early Dissemination and Late
Cancer Recurrence
David P aez, Melissa J. Labonte, Pierre Bohanes, Wu Zhang, Leonor Benhanim, Yan Ning, Takeru Wakatsuki,
Fotios Loupakis, and Heinz-Josef Lenz
Abstract
Cancer dormancy is a stage in tumor progression in which residual disease remains occult and
asymptomatic for a prolonged period of time. Dormant tumor cells can be present as one of the earliest
stages in tumor development, as well as a stage in micrometastases, and/or minimal residual disease left after
an apparently successful treatment of the primary tumor. The general mechanisms that regulate the
transition of disseminated tumor cells that have lain dormant into a proliferative state remain largely
unknown. However, regulation of the growth from dormant tumor cells may be explained in part through
the interaction of the tumor cell with its microenvironment, limitations in the blood supply, or an active
immune system. An understanding of the regulatory machinery of these processes is essential for identifying
early cancer biomarkers and could provide a rationale for the development of novel agents to target dormant
tumor cells. This review focuses on the different signaling models responsible for early cancer dissemination
and tumor recurrence that are involved in dormancy pathways. Clin Cancer Res; 18(3); 1–9. Ó2011
AACR.
Introduction
The major cause of cancer-related deaths is metastatic
growth of disseminated tumor cells (DTC) from the primary
tumor. Metastatic disease may occur years or even decades
after successful treatment of the primary tumor by surgery
and adjuvant treatment (1, 2). It has been proposed that this
latency period is due to a clinical phenomenon called tumor
dormancy. Dormant tumor cells may exist in a quiescent
state for many years as solitary tumor cells [i.e., cellular
dormancy (3–5)], or as micrometastases whose cellular
proliferation is counterbalanced by apoptosis [i.e., tumor
mass dormancy (6, 7)]. Consequently, tumor dormancy is a
stage in cancer progression in which residual disease is
present but is not clinically apparent.
During carcinogenesis, tumor cells accumulate genetic
alterations that lead to immortalization (loss of function of
TP53, retinoblastoma 1 (Rb), p16, and/or gain of telome-
rase) and transformation (gain of RAS or BRAF mutations,
and ERBB2 amplification). Recent evidence indicates that
DTCs have different and fewer genetic alterations compared
with primary tumor cells, suggesting the early dissemina-
tion of human cancers (8, 9). The general mechanisms that
regulate the transition of DTCs that have lain dormant into a
proliferative state remain largely unknown. The presence of
particular genetic abnormalities acquired by dormant cells
may explain the early dissemination of tumor cells, the
latency state, and resistance to the conventional therapeu-
tics used in the treatment of cancer that target actively
dividing cells. However, additional mechanisms, such as
the interaction of the tumor cell with its microenvironment,
limitations in the blood supply, or an active immune
system, can also explain the regulation of the growth of
dormant cells.
By the time of diagnosis, DTCs can be found in secondary
organs such as bone marrow and lymph nodes (10). The
detection of circulating tumor cells may explain the dis-
semination from primary tumors to target organs (11). The
ability of these cells to become tumor metastases is a
complex mechanism that may be explained by the tumor
dormancy process (Fig. 1). The mechanisms that are
involved in tumor dormancy, in relation to tumor recur-
rence and sensitivity to therapeutic interventions, represent
an area of major interest and investigation. This review
discusses the importance of cancer dormancy and how this
model is part of disease progression and therapeutic
response.
Influence of the microenvironment on cancer cell
dormancy
Recent evidence indicates that the tumor microenviron-
ment is a critical regulator of cancer progression (12–15)
and a major factor in determining the survival and growth of
DTCs at preferential metastatic sites (16). Several of the
Authors' Affiliation: Division of Medical Oncology and USC Norris Com-
prehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of South-
ern California, Los Angeles, California
Corresponding Author: Heinz-Josef Lenz, Sharon A. Carpenter Labora-
tory, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine,
University of Southern California, 1441 Eastlake Avenue, Los Angeles, CA
90033. Phone: 323–865-3967; Fax: 323–865-0061; E-mail: lenz@usc.edu
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2186
Ó2011 American Association for Cancer Research.
Clinical
Cancer
Research
www.aacrjournals.org OF1
Research.
on July 16, 2017. © 2011 American Association for Cancer clincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Published OnlineFirst December 9, 2011; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2186