12.3 OBSERVATIONS OF THE FORMATION OF LOW-LEVEL ROTATION: THE 5 JUNE 2001 SUMNER COUNTY, KANSAS TORNADO David C. Dowell 1 , Yvette P. Richardson 2 , Joshua M. Wurman 3 1 National Center for Atmospheric Research * , Boulder, CO 2 Department of Meteorology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 3 School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 1. INTRODUCTION Evidence from numerical simulations (Klemp and Rotunno 1983; Lewellen 1993; Wicker and Wilhelmson 1995) and visual observations indicates that mesocyclones and tornadoes are features that evolve rapidly (time scale ~1 min) and that have significant gradients in velocity within the lowest 1 km. Although our understanding of mesocylones and tornadoes in supercells has been improved greatly by the study of multiple-Doppler radar observations (Heymsfield 1978; Ray et al. 1981; Brandes 1984; Johnson et al. 1987; Dowell and Bluestein 1997; Wakimoto et al. 1998; Trapp 1999; Ziegler et al. 2001; Richardson et al. 2001), it was not possible with these observations to diagnose low-level mesocyclogenesis and tornadogenesis directly owing to limited spatial and temporal resolution. Previous datasets obtained from airborne and from fixed, ground-based radars typically included updates only every ~5 min and observations at only 1-2 levels in the lowest 1 km. Two Doppler on Wheels (DOW) mobile radars (Wurman et al. 1997; Wurman 2001) collected data of unprecedented quality at low levels in a supercell thunderstorm in Sumner County, Kansas on 5 June 2001. Since the target mesocyclone was west and south-southwest of DOW2 and DOW3, respectively, the scanning geometry was favorable for dual-Doppler wind synthesis. By focusing scans on the lowest ~5 km of the storm, each radar was able to obtain volumetric data with updates approximately every 70 s. The mesocyclone and tornado were relatively close to (2-17 km away from) each radar. The radar beamwidths corresponding to these ranges were 30–280 m, and the characteristics of the flow in the lowest 1 km AGL were represented by Doppler measurements at 4 (or more) different elevation angles. During the 30 min period of coordinated dual-Doppler scanning, a low-level mesocyclone formed, and a weak tornado formed and dissipated within the mesocyclone. We describe below preliminary results from an ongoing dual- Doppler analysis of observations of the Sumner County storm. 2. FORMATION OF THE LOW-LEVEL MESOCYCLONE When dual-Doppler scanning began, the Sumner County storm had a rather large north-south oriented reflectivity appendage on the southwest side (Fig. 1a). Within several min, the appendage had become bow shaped (Fig. 1b) after a portion of it had surged ahead. As the tornado was forming, an initially small hook echo to the north of the apex of the bow * The National Center for Atmospheric Research is sponsored by the National Science Foundation. Corresponding author address: David C. Dowell, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Advanced Studies Program, P. O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307-3000; ddowell@ucar.edu (Fig. 1b) developed into a prominent spiral in reflectivity (Fig. 1c). The hook echo appeared to be an indicator, rather than an instigator, of the developing tornado in this case. To date, we have edited and analyzed volumetric dual- Doppler observations at 8 different times during this period of mesocyclogenesis and tornadogenesis. To interpolate the edited radar data to Cartesian grids (∆x=∆y=∆z=250 m), we used a uniform, isotropic Barnes weighting function with a smoothing parameter of 0.2 km 2 . We synthesized the wind field with a traditional method employing upward integration of the continuity equation. The dual-Doppler analysis at 0014 UTC indicates a disorganized structure with multiple updrafts at 4.0 km AGL (Fig. 2a). The northernmost of these updrafts was at the intersection of the reflectivity appendage (Fig. 1a) with the main body of the storm echo. A comparison of the analyses at 0.25 and 4.0 km AGL indicates a significant rearward (relative to the eastward storm motion) slope with height of the updraft region at the initial time (Figs. 2a and 2b). The main (north- south oriented) portion of the low-level updraft was initially linear (Figs. 2b and 2c). However, the northern flank of the low-level updraft curved sharply back toward the west beneath the northernmost mid-level updraft (Figs. 2a and 2b). The observations indicate a rather distinct difference between “laminar” flow to the east and “turbulent” flow to the west of the low-level updraft. For example, the raw Doppler velocity (not shown) and the synthesized vertical velocity (Fig. 2b) fields were rather smooth on the east side, but they contained numerous velocity perturbations ~1 km wide on the west side. During the first several min of data collection, there was cyclonic vertical vorticity over a broad area between the gust front and the region of strong northerly outflow to its west (Figs. 3a-3c). The magnitude of vorticity tended to be greatest just behind the north-south oriented gust front, and near the northern flank of the low-level updraft that curved back toward the west. Low-level mesocyclogenesis occurred near the gust front, in the south portion of the region that is plotted in Fig. 3. As the mesocyclone intensified, the air with relatively large values of vertical vorticity near the northern flank of the updraft appeared to be advected southward into the developing circulation (Fig. 3). The overall region of cyclonic vorticity was flanked by relatively high wind speeds (a “jet” of northerly outflow) on its west side. During future work with this case, we will test two hypotheses concerning the location of low-level mesocyclogenesis. The former is that the location of the mesocyclone was determined primarily by low- level processes. Enhanced convergence (stretching of vertical vorticity) at the intersection of the outflow jet with the gust front could have produced the local maximum in vertical vorticity near the leading left side of the jet (Fig. 3a). The latter hypothesis is that the focusing of the low-level rotation occurred in response to an intensifying updraft and mesocyclone aloft (not shown).