Evidence That the Anomalous Emission from CaF 2 :Yb 2+ Is Not Described by the Impurity Trapped Exciton Model C. MacKeen, F. Bridges,* , M. Kozina, A. Mehta, M. F. Reid, § J.-P. R. Wells, § and Z. Barandiara ́ n Physics Department, University of California, Santa Cruz, California 95064, United States Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, California 94025, United States § Dodd-Walls Centre for Photonic and Quantum Technologies and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Canterbury, PB 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand Departamento de Química, Instituto Universitario de Ciencia de Materiales Nicola ́ s Cabrera, and Condensed Matter Physics Center (IFIMAC), Universidad Autó noma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain ABSTRACT: Yb-substituted CaF 2 exhibits an anomalous red-shifted luminescence after UV excitation, attributed to the relaxation of impurity trapped excitons (ITE). CaF 2 :Yb is the archetype system for this model, in which the Yb 2+ ions can be excited into a long- lived (ms) exciton state. Upon de-excitation, the emission intensity should be proportional to the Yb 2+ concentration, but that could not be checked when this model was rst proposed. Using the X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) technique, we determine the fractions of Yb 2+ and Yb 3+ for low Yb concentrations, 0.01% to 0.1%, and thus determine the net concentration of Yb 2+ . A comparison with luminescence data shows that the intensity is not proportional to the Yb 2+ concentration, and only a fraction of Yb 2+ ions contributes to the anomalous luminescence. This is inconsistent with the ITE model and illustrates the importance of checking the dependence of the emission intensity on the Yb 2+ concentration. I n a large number of lanthanide-doped crystals there is a large Stokes shift of the luminescence emission upon UV excitation, particularly for Yb 2+ and Eu 2+ ions. 1 The optical properties of CaF 2 :Yb 2+ were rst reported about 50 years ago, 2,3 and the unusually large red-shift and bandwidth of the luminescence emission were considered anomalous. A model to describe such systems was developed in the 1980s by McClure and others, 1,4,5 in which the optical center is called an impurity trapped exciton (ITE). Dorenbos 1 provides a long list of potential ITE systems with anomalous emissions, mostly with Yb and Eu dopants. Upon UV excitation (within this model), one of the 4f 14 electrons of Yb 2+ is excited to the 4f 13 5d state; this state decays to the exciton state in which the excited electron forms a delocalized extended state on neighboring metal atoms. 5 The resulting Yb 3+ ion plus the delocalized electron state forms the transient ITE statea bound electronhole pair. While in the ITE state, the cube of surrounding F atoms should collapse slightly (again a transient eect), leading to a decreased YbF bond distance, by 0.2 Å, 4 which explains the bandwidth of the emission. The ITE model has been accepted in the literature for over 30 years 1,48 and continues to be used in the current literature. 9,10 Recently, however, Barandiara ́ n and Seijo 11 have examined the ITE hypothesis by means of ab initio relativistic quantum chemical calculations. The results for Yb 2+ in CaF 2 allow the authors to conclude that none of the electronic states of the Yb 2+ active centers can be considered responsible for the anomalous emission; hence the need of direct experimental scrutiny of the ITE model. Yb substitutes for Ca in CaF 2 :Yb and forms several defects. Clusters form at higher concentrations, 12, 13 while the anomalous emission centers form at much lower concen- trations. In the ITE model, the number of excitons excited by UV should be proportional to the number of Yb 2+ ions present. At the time the ITE model was rst developed, there was no way to measure the Yb 2+ concentration in order to check for a linear dependence of anomalous luminescence intensity. In fact only recently has this been possible for very low defect concentrations down to 0.01% Yb. Here we provide direct experimental evidence that the ITE model cannot explain anomalous luminescence in CaF 2 :Yb; rst the anomalous luminescence intensity is not proportional to the Yb 2+ concentration, and second, only a small fraction of Yb 2+ ions are involved in anomalous emission. Normalized Yb L III absorption edges are plotted in Figure 1 for three concentrations: 0.01, 0.05, and 0.1% Yb; the plots are normalized well above the edge. The L III edge has two peaks separated by about 7 eV: the lower one (8942 eV) is associated with Yb 2+ , while the upper one (8949 eV) is for Yb 3+ . For the Received: May 5, 2017 Accepted: July 5, 2017 Published: July 5, 2017 Letter pubs.acs.org/JPCL © 2017 American Chemical Society 3313 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b01103 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2017, 8, 33133316