Citation: Tennyson, A.J.D.; Greer, L.;
Lubbe, P.; Marx, F.G.; Richards,M.D.;
Giovanardi, S.; Rawlence, N.J. A
New Species of Large Duck (Aves:
Anatidae) from the Miocene of
New Zealand. Taxonomy 2022, 2,
136–144. https://doi.org/10.3390/
taxonomy2010011
Academic Editor: Mathias
Harzhauser
Received: 16 February 2022
Accepted: 7 March 2022
Published: 9 March 2022
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral
with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional affil-
iations.
Copyright: © 2022 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).
Article
A New Species of Large Duck (Aves: Anatidae) from the
Miocene of New Zealand
†
Alan J. D. Tennyson
1,
* , Liam Greer
2
, Pascale Lubbe
3
, Felix G. Marx
1,4
, Marcus D. Richards
4
,
Simone Giovanardi
5
and Nicolas J. Rawlence
2
1
Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, Wellington 6011, New Zealand; felix.marx@tepapa.govt.nz
2
Otago Palaeogenetics Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Otago, Dunedin 9010, New Zealand;
pwlgreer@gmail.com (L.G.); nic.rawlence@otago.ac.nz (N.J.R.)
3
Department of Anatomy, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand; pl.lubbe@gmail.com
4
Department of Geology, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand; arcadiafrica@gmail.com
5
School of Natural and Computational Sciences, Massey University, Auckland 0632, New Zealand;
giovanerd90@gmail.com
* Correspondence: alant@tepapa.govt.nz
† urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E7FFF522-08CD-4B1B-9D8A-3247556655D0.
Abstract: We describe a new species of extinct duck, Miotadorna catrionae sp. nov. (Anatidae,
Tadornini, Tadorninae), based on a right humerus from the Miocene lacustrine deposits of St Bathans,
Otago, New Zealand. Principal component analysis reveals that the new taxon is distinguished
by its large size and relative proportions. This is the eighth and largest species of duck described
from the St Bathans fossil assemblage and further underscores the global importance of this site for
understanding anatid evolution.
Keywords: Tadornini; Miotadorna catrionae sp. nov.; fossil; shelduck; lacustrine; Bannockburn Formation
1. Introduction
In the St (Saint) Bathans area of Central Otago, New Zealand, outcrops of the Bannock-
burn Formation, a late early–earliest middle Miocene lacustrine sequence, include a rich
fossil biota from the ancient Lake Manuherikia [1–3]. The deposits have yielded the most
diverse terrestrial vertebrate assemblage described from pre-Pleistocene Zealandia: numer-
ous fish [4] and water birds, as well as rarer land birds, bats, lizards, frogs, crocodilians, a
rhynchocephalian, a turtle and other mammal remains of uncertain affinity [2].
St Bathans is one of the richest localities for Miocene anatids worldwide, with seven
species described to date [2]. Two geese may also have been present but remains thus far
have been too fragmentary to allow their formal description [5]. Here, we describe a large
anatid humerus and demonstrate that it represents a new species of large duck.
2. Material and Methods
Until now, most of the large anatid fossils from the St Bathans area were referred to
the extinct shelduck Miotadorna sanctibathansi Worthy, Tennyson, Jones, McNamara and
Douglas, 2007 [6], while a few bones were referred to undescribed forms of geese [5,6].
We tested the hypothesis that all the large anatid humeri from this fossil assemblage
represent one species. This was conducted by assessing morphological variation, using
both morphometrics and anatomy.
We measured all large anatid humeri (those about the size of M. sanctibathansi) from
the St Bathans assemblage housed at the Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa
(Wellington, New Zealand; NMNZ) and one specimen at the Geology Museum, Department
of Geology, University of Otago (Dunedin, New Zealand; OU) that preserve at least one
of the following: total length, proximal width, proximal depth, shaft width, distal width
Taxonomy 2022, 2, 136–144. https://doi.org/10.3390/taxonomy2010011 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/taxonomy