Comparison Between University of Wisconsin and Celsior Solution on
Morphology and Viability of Rat Aorta After Cold Storage
B. Nardo, G. Cavallari, F. Catena, B. Santoni, P. Turi, E. Giordano, G. Pasquinelli, L. Badiali de Giorgi,
A. Faenza, and A. Cavallari
T
HE EFFECT of preservation solutions with different
potassium concentrations on vascular tissue is still
under investigation. Some reports demonstrated that low-
potassium solutions are more suitable for short-term stor-
age of blood vessels, as well as for long-term preservation of
arteries.
1
Moreover, solutions containing a higher potas-
sium concentration, such as University of Wisconsin solu-
tion (UW), can affect the homeostasis of the vascular tissue,
altering the equilibrium among the several vasoactive en-
dothelium-derived substances.
2,3
Endothelial cells release
vasoactive substances exerting major effects on local vaso-
regulation. Among them, nitric oxide (NO
) has an impor-
tant role in the powerful relaxation of vascular smooth cells
and in the inhibition of platelet adhesion and aggregation.
4
We investigated the effect of long-term cold storage in
high-potassium solution (UW) and low-potassium solution
(CELSIOR) on functional as well as morphologic changes
of the rat aorta.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Male Wistar rats, weighing 220 to 250 g, maintained under
standard conditions were used. All the animals were anesthetized
by ether inhalation. The in-situ flushing of the thoracic aorta was
performed through the abdominal aorta with 10 mL of cold UW
(Viaspan) or CELSIOR (Celsior, IMTIX s.r.l.) solution. The
vascular segments were then stored in UW or CELSIOR solution
and kept at 4°C up to 72 hours. Circular biopsy samples of aorta
segments were processed for scanning (SEM) and transmission
electron microscopy (TEM). A segment of aorta was cut into a
spiral strip measuring approximately 20 4 mm and used for
functional analysis. Tissue functionality was evaluated during an
organ bath assay in terms of contraction in response to norepi-
nephrine (NE) 10
-7
mol/L, and subsequent relaxation in response
to acetylcholine (Ach) 10
-5
mol/L. The administration of Ach was
followed by stimulus with a saturated solution of NO
10
-6
mol/L.
Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t test for un-
paired data.
RESULTS
The segments of aorta used as controls produced a contrac-
tile response to NE 10
-7
mol/L of 429 54 mg (mean
SEM) and a percentage of relaxation to Ach 10
-5
M of
82.2 2.3%. No morphologic and functional differences
were found in the aorta segments stored in both UW and
CELSIOR solution after 24 and 48 hours. Better morphol-
ogy and functional responses were observed after 72 hours
in the aorta stored in CELSIOR as compared with UW
solution (268 21 mg vs 122 34 mg to the adrenergic
stimulus, P .05; 64.3 6.8% vs 31.8 8.5% to the
acetylcholinergic stimulus, P .05. A relaxation-response
to NO
10
-6
mol/L was observed in all aorta segments
stored, but not in the vascular segments maintained in UW
solution up to 72 hours.
CONCLUSIONS
The data obtained in this study show that both UW and
CELSIOR solution at 4°C do not significantly alter either
the morphology or the function of aortic grafts after 48
hours of preservation. On the contrary, for relatively long
periods (72 hours), UW solution induced severe morpho-
logic and functional modifications that were not observed in
the aorta preserved in CELSIOR solution. Our results
suggest that CELSIOR solution is more suitable as com-
pared to UW solution for cold long-term storage of vascular
allografts.
REFERENCES
1. Saldanha C, Hearse DJ: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 288:373,
1989
2. Nardo B, Bellusci R, Badiali de Giorgi, et al: Transpl Proc
24:2077, 1992
3. Abebe W, Cavallari N, Agrawal DK, et al: Transplantation
56:808, 1993
4. Furchgott RF, Zawadski JV: Nature 98:783, 1980
From the Second Department of Surgery (B.N., G.C., F.C.,
P.S., B.T., A.F., A.C.), Department of Biochemistry (E.G.), Elec-
tron Microscopy (G.P., L.dG.), University of Bologna, Via Mas-
sarenti 9, 4138 Bologna, Italy.
Address reprint requests to Dr B. Nardo, 2nd Department of
Surgery, Via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
© 2000 by Elsevier Science Inc. 0041-1345/00/$–see front matter
655 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10010 PII S0041-1345(99)00865-9
Transplantation Proceedings, 32, 35 (2000) 35