Research Article
Cycloplegic Effects on the Cylindrical
Components of the Refraction
Athar Zareei , Milad Abdolahian , and Shahram Bamdad
Poostchi Ophthalmology Research Center, Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine,
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
Correspondence should be addressed to Shahram Bamdad; shahrambamdad@yahoo.com
Received 1 September 2020; Revised 11 March 2021; Accepted 25 March 2021; Published 5 April 2021
Academic Editor: Alessandro Meduri
Copyright © 2021 Athar Zareei et al. is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License,
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
It is important to predict which astigmatic patients require separate refraction for near vision. is study compared cylindrical
componentschangesbycyclopentolate1%forthelowandhighamountofastigmatism.erighteyesof1014healthyindividuals
(307 males and 707 females) with cylindrical refractive power more than −0.5 diopter on autorefractometer were selected. Both
male and female patients in the age range of 17–45 years were refracted before and after cycloplegia, using 1% cyclopentolate. All
volunteers were classified into 2 subgroups including the lower astigmatism group (−2.25 to −0.50) and the higher astigmatic
group (−2.50 to over). Alpines’ method was used to compare the effect of cycloplegic drop on cylindrical power. e mean age in
the lower astigmatism group (29.58; 95% CI: 29.18 to 29.99 years) was not significantly different from the higher astigmatic group
(29.85; 95% CI: 29.07 to 30.62) and there were no significant differences in gender between these two groups (P � 0.54).
Differences between wet and dry refraction in J0 (−0.03; 95% CI:−0.06 to −0.008) and J45 (−0.03; 95% CI:−0.06 to −0.01) were
significantonlyinthehigherastigmaticgroup.Axischangesbythecycloplegicdropinthelowerastigmatismgroupwere3.51(CI:
3.22to3.81)andaxischangesbythecycloplegicdropinthehigherastigmatismgroupwere2.21(CI:1.73to2.49).Inpatientswith
a lower amount of astigmatism (−2.25 to −0.50), additional near subjective refraction could be done for precise determination of
axis and in patients with a higher amount of astigmatism (−2.50 to over), near subjective refraction might be done for precise
determination of power.
1. Introduction
In clinical practice, astigmatism is a common refractive
condition. Although lots of investigations have been
performed into the possible etiology of astigmatism, no
single model or theory of the decisive development of
astigmatism has been found. Despite extensive research,
the exact cause of astigmatism is still not known. One
potential explanation behind astigmatic development
would be a hereditary etiology. e studies into genetics
and astigmatism do cause controversies. Some degree of
astigmatismheritabilitywasindicatedinsomestudiesand
s an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance has also
been identified. It seems that both genetic and environ-
mental factors play roles in astigmatic developments.
Otherenvironmentalpossiblecauseswouldbethetension
of extraocular muscles, eyelid pressure on the cornea, and
visual tasks in which astigmatism develops in response to
visualcues.Inanumberofethnicgroupsanddiseases,the
interaction between the cornea and the eyelids appears to
be a possible reason for increased astigmatism. Studies
show that the eyelids pathology and eyelid pressures
during reading could also cause changes in corneal
astigmatism [1]. Research into high astigmatism children
shows that eyelids affect the axis and degree of corneal
astigmatism [2]. Although it is clear that the eyelids can
have an influence on corneal shape, there is still no evi-
dence that conclusively shows that eyelids pressures cause
corneal astigmatism.
Atbirth,childrenexhibitahighincidenceofastigmatism
whichiscornealinorigin.Aschildrengrowolder,thecornea
flattens with significantly reduced astigmatism. Over the age
Hindawi
Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 2021, Article ID 8810782, 6 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8810782