Models for Predicting Project Performance in China Using
Project Management Practices Adopted by
Foreign AEC Firms
Florence Yean Yng Ling
1
; Sui Pheng Low
2
; ShouQing Wang
3
; and Temitope Egbelakin
4
Abstract: China is a new market to many international architectural, engineering, and construction AEC firms and it is not known what
would be the likely project outcomes, based on different project management PM practices adopted. This research developed and tested
five models to predict the likely project success levels, based on PM practices adopted by foreign AEC firms in China. Based on data
obtained from 33 projects, multiple linear regression MLR models for predicting the performance of foreign managed projects in China
were constructed. The models were tested against 13 new cases, and the results show that they are able to predict project outcomes with
some level of accuracy. The models show that certain scope management practices can be used to predict owner satisfaction, profit margin,
and cost and quality performance of the project. Construction industry practitioners who are managing projects in China may benefit from
the findings by focusing more on upstream management, like managing project scope, in order to ensure project success. It is recom-
mended that construction industry practitioners use the MLR models to make preliminary assessment of the possibility of project success
based on the type of PM practices they intend to adopt in China. From the results, they can then decide if they should change their
practices or abort the project.
DOI: 10.1061/ASCE0733-93642008134:12983
CE Database subject headings: China; Foreign projects; International commissions; Performance characteristics; Construction
management; Models.
Introduction
The rapid economic expansion in China has resulted in many
construction activities, which make its construction industry one
of the largest in the world NBSC 2002. Problems such as cost
overrun, schedule delay, low quality, and stakeholders’ dissatis-
faction are frequently reported in China Wang et al. 2006. As
foreign architectural, engineering, and construction AEC firms
are expected to tap into these opportunities and participate in
developing China’s built environment, it would be useful to know
the project management PM practices that should be used to
overcome these problems.
This paper investigates PM practices used by international
non-Chinese AEC firms in China. The study explores these
firms’ practices at the project level. The specific objectives of this
paper are: 1 to find explanatory variables PM practices that
significantly affect the performance of projects managed by for-
eign firms in China and 2 to construct and test models to predict
the performance of foreign managed projects in China, based on
their PM practices. The first objective is important because it
identifies aspects of PM practices that foreign firms operating in
China could improve on so as to achieve project success. The
second objective is also important because project performance
prediction models developed in this study would enable owners,
consultants, and contractors to predict how successful their
projects are likely to be, based on different PM practices to be
adopted.
The international construction focus is chosen because unlike
domestic construction, international construction is marked by the
combination of business and PM skills with both mobile factors
of production and location-bound support industries Enderwick
1993. This study is significant because many foreign firms are
entering China’s construction industry for the first time and know-
ing the more critical PM practices to adopt would help to enhance
project performance. In this study, an “international project” is
one that is located outside the country where the AEC firm’s
headquarters is based. This international project is then said to be
located in the “host country,” which, in this paper, refers to China.
Foreign AEC firms in this paper refer to non-Chinese interna-
tional firms that are operating in China.
Literature Review
International Construction
In addition to the typical risks of a domestic project, the interna-
tional construction process has unique political, economic, and
1
Associate Professor, Dept. of Building, National Univ. of Singapore,
4 Architecture Dr., Singapore 117566 corresponding author. E-mail:
bdglyy@nus.edu.sg
2
Professor, Department of Building, National Univ. of Singapore, 4
Architecture Drive, Singapore 117566. E-mail: bdglowsp@nus.edu.sg
3
Professor, Dy-Head, Dept. of Construction Management, School of
Civil Engineering, Tsinghua Univ., Beijing, China 100084. E-mail:
sqwang@tsinghua.edu.cn
4
Research Asst., Dept. of Building, National Univ. of Singapore, 4
Architecture Dr., Singapore 117566. E-mail: temitope_egbelakin@yahoo.
com
Note. Discussion open until May 1, 2009. Separate discussions must
be submitted for individual papers. The manuscript for this paper was
submitted for review and possible publication on January 10, 2007; ap-
proved on June 2, 2008. This paper is part of the Journal of Construction
Engineering and Management, Vol. 134, No. 12, December 1, 2008.
©ASCE, ISSN 0733-9364/2008/12-983–990/$25.00.
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT © ASCE / DECEMBER 2008 / 983
Downloaded 27 Dec 2008 to 166.111.44.134. Redistribution subject to ASCE license or copyright; see http://pubs.asce.org/copyright