Review
Aquaporins and membrane diffusion of CO
2
in living organisms
☆
Ralf Kaldenhoff ⁎, Lei Kai, Norbert Uehlein
Department of Biology, Applied Plant Sciences, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Schnittspahnstrasse 10, D-64287 Darmstadt, Germany
abstract article info
Article history:
Received 2 July 2013
Received in revised form 26 September 2013
Accepted 29 September 2013
Available online 17 October 2013
Keywords:
Aquaporin
Membrane permeability for CO
2
Gas exchange
Aquaporin structure-function
CO
2
conductance of aquaporins
Background: Determination of CO
2
diffusion rates in living cells revealed inconsistencies with existing models
about the mechanisms of membrane gas transport. Mainly, these discrepancies exist in the determined CO
2
diffusion rates of bio-membranes, which were orders of magnitudes below those for pure lipid bilayers or
theoretical considerations as well as in the observation that membrane insertion of specific aquaporins was
rescuing high CO
2
transport rates. This effect was confirmed by functional aquaporin protein analysis in
heterologous expression systems as well as in bacteria, plants and partly in mammals.
Scope of Review: This review summarizes the arguments in favor of and against aquaporin facilitated membrane
diffusion of CO
2
and reports about its importance for the physiology of living organisms.
Major Conclusions: Most likely, the aquaporin tetramer forming an additional fifth pore is required for CO
2
diffusion facilitation. Aquaporin tetramer formation, membrane integration and disintegration could provide a
mechanism for regulation of cellular CO
2
exchange. The physiological importance of aquaporin mediated CO
2
membrane diffusion could be shown for plants and cyanobacteria and partly for mammals.
General Significance: Taking the mentioned results into account, consequences for our current picture of cell
membrane transport emerge. It appears that in some or many instances, membranes might not be as permeable
as it was suggested by current bio-membrane models, opening an additional way of controlling the cellular influx
or efflux of volatile substances like CO
2
. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Aquaporins.
© 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. The debate about membrane CO
2
diffusion and aquaporins
The gas exchange between cells and between cells and atmosphere
is one of the preconditions for an intact physiology in almost all living
organisms. For the majority of organisms, oxygen and CO
2
are the most
significant gases with this regard. While in animals, plants, fungi and
many bacteria oxygen is required as an electron acceptor for respiration,
CO
2
is the product of catalytic reactions and exchanged with the
atmosphere. In plants, CO
2
is also the substrate for sugar synthesis
initiated and catalyzed during the reductive pentose-phosphate cycle,
also known as the Calvin–Benson cycle. For this process, CO
2
diffuses in
the opposite direction from atmosphere into the cells respectively
organelles. Even though the diffusion and exchange of both gases might
be of equal importance, this review will focus on the CO
2
diffusion and
a possible involvement of aquaporins in that process due to the fact
that there are currently more experimental data available to this regard.
Despite this availability of information, the experimental data obtained
for the diffusion of CO
2
through biomembranes are inconsistent even
contradictory. Accordingly, the experts are split into one faction stating
that CO
2
diffusion through membranes is so rapid that any membrane
protein would reduce the flow. Consequently, a protein facilitating CO
2
membrane diffusion is not necessary and not existing. Measurements
indicating that CO
2
membrane fluxes increase if certain proteins inserted
were suspected to be incorrect because data was provided from
experiments with possible technical problems. For example, if gas
diffusion was monitored by a device such as a stopped flow spectro-
photometer with a detection lag time larger than a theoretical calculated
value for the diffusion time, the figures must reflect an artifact because
the gas has diffused before the measurement begins. Nonetheless,
scientists from the other faction claim that the measured CO
2
diffusion
rates were by orders of magnitudes lower than the theoretical ones. If
this holds true, proteins facilitating gas respectively CO
2
transport are
mandatory for high diffusion rates and these in turn are one of the
preconditions for smoothly running physiology processes. In this essay,
we try to depict the arguments of both sides. However, results from our
own studies revealed lower CO
2
permeability of biomembranes than
estimated from theoretical considerations and a significant role of
aquaporins in the diffusion of CO
2
. Regarding this, it is clear that the
authors favor the point of view of the latter faction.
2. Reasons for and against
Support for a significant role of aquaporins in gas diffusion came
from the analysis of aquaporin function in heterologous expression
systems [1–4]. Aquaporin membrane-insertion increased the cellular
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1840 (2014) 1592–1595
☆ This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Aquaporins.
⁎ Corresponding author. Tel.: +49 6151 16 3805.
E-mail address: kaldenhoff@bio.tu-darmstadt.de (R. Kaldenhoff).
0304-4165/$ – see front matter © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.09.037
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/bbagen